Why This FBI Whistleblower Seconds Jill Stein’s Call For A New 9/11 Investigation

After the events of September 11, 2001, as a longtime FBI agent and division legal counsel, I blew the whistle on the FBI’s failure to act on information provided by the Minneapolis field office that could have prevented the attacks.

On this sad 15th anniversary of 9/11, I am encouraged to see that Green Party Presidential Candidate Jill Stein put out a statement calling for a new investigation not afflicted by all the limitations, partisan obstacles and other problems that adversely affected the 9/11 Commission.

It’s what so many of us have long called for, including me personally (see here and here) as someone with a front row seat to the FBI’s initial cover-ups. The FBI was only one of the agencies and political entities which strived to cover up the truth of why and how they all ignored a “system blinking red” in the months before the attacks. So successful had this been that when I testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee in June 2002, I actually felt I had to explain why the truth was important. That we “owed it to the public, especially the victims of terrorism, to be completely honest” and “learning from our mistakes” were two of the reasons I came up with.

But the biggest mistake, the launching of the ruinous, counterproductive”war on terror,” had already broken out even before my testimony (and long before the 9/11 Commission was allowed to begin work), along with its attendant war crimes such as torture, which were secretly “legalized.” Not only had truth again become the first casualty, but Cicero’s adage was playing out: “in times of war, the law falls silent.”

As retired Major Todd Pierce recently said in an interview: “Everything that we have done since 9/11 is wrong.” And I think that is largely because people still don’t know the full truth about how 9/11 could have easily been prevented if only agencies and the Bush Administration had shared information internally, between agencies and with the public (see “Wikileaks and 9-11: What If?“).

I debated, early on, with a former CIA legal counsel who claimed war was the answer as opposed to investigating/prosecuting terrorism as plain crime, and later tried to explain more fully why “The War on Terror (Is) A False Promise for National Security,” published in the International Journal of Intelligence Ethics.

So much of the ease in perpetrating this type of deceit, described so well in David Swanson’s book “War Is A Lie“, comes back to Mark Twain’s classic adage that “A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.” So it took a couple years after 9-11, after the first in the long series of Mideast wars had been launched, with US military occupations firmly installed for the duration (in what has now come to be called “perma-war”) before the 9/11 Commission and other official and congressional inquiries could get out even the tiniest bit of truth, revealing that 9/11 was enabled by the lack of sharing of pertinent intelligence information inside and between agencies as well as with the public, not any lack of massive, non-relevant metadata collection on innocent people. We also learned that the countries we had launched war on, or had judged culpable for the attacks, Iraq and Iran, were not at all involved in 9-11. It’s jaw-dropping that it’s taken nearly 15 years to get the “28 pages” in the Joint Intelligence Committee’s Report finally released. The “28 pages” show no culpability on the part of either Iraq or Iran, just strong indications of Saudi funding and support of the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Another retired intelligence officer who cares about integrity in intelligence, Elizabeth Murray, Deputy National Intelligence Officer for Near East, CIA and National Intelligence Council (ret.), also agrees with Jill Stein’s call:

I have long believed there needs to be a kind of 9/11 “Truth Commission” – completely independent and untainted by any political organization – in order for this country to be able to move forward in any meaningful way. The sad fact is that many folks, for varying reasons, just don’t want to “go there” – i.e. the truth may be too painful for them. I don’t know exactly what happened on 9/11, but given my government’s record on Iraq and other issues, I have no reason to trust the official version.

I think that keeping the public in a fog regarding 9/11 is extremely destructive to the health of the nation. 9/11 is like an open running sore – let’s heal it, painful as it may be.

Despite Mark Twain’s adage and the difficulty for Americans to see through the fog of perma-war, it’s never too late to wise up. As Twain’s fellow humorist Will Rogers asked, “If stupidity got us into this mess, why can’t it get us out?”

In May of 2002, Coleen Rowley brought some of the FBI’s pre 9/11 lapses to light and testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee about some of the endemic problems facing the FBI and the intelligence community. Rowley’s memo to FBI Director Robert Mueller in connection with the Joint Intelligence Committee’s Inquiry led to a two-year long Department of Justice Inspector General investigation. She was one of three whistleblowers chosen as persons of the year by TIME magazine. She currently works with the Veterans for Peace chapter in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Reprinted from Huffington Post with permission from the author.

10 thoughts on “Why This FBI Whistleblower Seconds Jill Stein’s Call For A New 9/11 Investigation”

  1. The people, ourselves, were manipulated as a weapon. Given the notion that misinformation done deliberately is a crime when They do it but a simple mechanism of war when We do it. Whoever They and We happen to be at the time. We were presented with a persistent bogeyman, the Osama… beware the Osama for he is everywhere… and then there was this…

    “That was not normal procedure. It was completely
    unintentional and the FBI is looking into it to prevent it from
    happening again,” U.S. Embassy spokesman Will Ostick told CNN on

    Ostick said he called the leftist politician, Gaspar
    Llamazares, to “express regret” on behalf of the embassy after the
    lawmaker’s hair and forehead wrinkles, taken from a photo, were mixed
    into an FBI image showing the possible appearance of Bin Laden now.

    which is the report of the “age progression” of bin Laden shown on the FBI website was actually the face of another person. The FBI said they didn’t actually have any VERIFIABLE image or voice communication from or for Osama for almost 8 years.

    Which opened a credibility window in the reporting by NSA, CIA, DHS, ahem.. let’s just assume, shall we, the entire reporting from all the agencies whose job was to keep the money flowing to the war machine.

    It also casts a shadow on whatever case and all cases collectively and yeah I’m not on my second cup yet so my sentences are going to be awkward…
    But every case, especially criminal, in which people who were or still are in prison partly based on the Age Progression database. That got covered up fairly quickly. But like any other coverup, the underlying truth isn’t killed. It’s left to fester and ferment until it’s not possible to keep the stench from escaping.

    Like the whole 9/11 process. There’s a lot of official debunking on each and every and all of the “conspiracy theories” surrounding it and all stem from the known fact that a boatload of information was withheld by official sources.

    Every broadcast about or from the modern Emmanuel Goldstein whoever is described by the modern Big Brother, now suspect. Always suspect for those of a skeptical or cynical outlook. Skeptical and Cynical are not exact synonyms but they are the exact antonyms for Gullible.

    One could say that Goldstein and Big Brother were both fictional or at best allegoric constructs of Orwell, (the “false” pen name of Eric Blair) but the not-truths of the Official Story aren’t pen names, fiction or allegory. They’re simply lies to enhance the call for War and more War. Make it sound like a slam dunk and anybody else who questions the narrative is “conspiracy theorist” and that is changed from actual Conspiracy to Commit a crime, something the FBI uses every day in their investigations, to being synonymous with “lunatic”.

    A proverb in the Book of Proverbs and attributed to Solomon “as dead flies cause the ointment of the apothecary to stink, so does a little foolishness in a man who is considered wise”.. there are other ways to put it, breaches in the wall, holes in the narrative, ahem. All apply. And every patch put on the narrative is going to show up, brightly, against the background of the original. Like a person who was presumed dead (by the FBI at least) was killed and dumped into the Indian ocean in a secret ceremony.

  2. The Gov’s lies about 9/11 are more than just an open sore – its 100% Treason – and the cover up about nano-thermite used as the controlled demolition by the media -esp. National Geographic is also treason. Anybody that worked on high risers could see this.

    1. Garry, I too am familiar with construction and am skeptical of the breach of the laws of physics, the 9/11 commission would have us believe.
      If you are a masonry contractor from northern Illinois, I may have worked for you in the 1980’s.
      If happily, it is you and you still have my number and care to give me a shout, I’d love to hear from you.

Comments are closed.