Kamal Nawash Republican Campaign Rally

All right, what’s the deal with this weird rally? Glenn Reynolds is flogging it, so there’s a clue. The other vector appears to be Horowitz.

Hussein Ibish, pointing out the absurd list of “sponsors” (Like Free Republic’s RighTalk, a dress shop in Arizona and a couple of obscure right-wing blogs, for example) says it’s a campaign rally for outcast Republican Kamal Nawash.

On Saturday, May 14, “Free Muslims Against Terrorism,” the group set up to stop criticism of Kamal Nawash by right-wing Zionists like Daniel Pipes and bolster his failed career as a Republican party candidate for local office in Virginia, is holding a “March against Terror” rally in Washington, DC (for more background on Nawash and “Free Muslims” see this). Representatives of most major Arab American and American Muslim groups in Washington received invitations to participate in the March, but all declined given Kamal’s unsavory background and activities, and his close association with and open courting of those most hostile to these communities such as the professional bigot Daniel Pipes and others. Indeed, one of the purposes of the March may be to force the mainstream groups to choose between having to join this unsavory figure and give his appalling efforts undeserved credibility, or decline and face future accusations from the likes of Pipes that their failure to join Kamal’s March indicates some sort of secret support for terrorism against the United States.

Nonetheless, Kamal has been vigorously promoting, with the help of his patrons Pipes, David Horowitz and other enemies of the community, the March and a growing list of “endorsers.” In an effort to inform the public, and to examine more closely who is willing to get into bed with whom, I have assembled the following notes on the organizations he says endorse his “March.” To call it a bunch of strange bedfellows does not really do this list justice. We are looking at everything from clothes shops in Arizona, Moonies, right-wing Zionists, and Christian fundamentalists, to Iranian monarchists, Iraqi supporters of the occupation, Darfurian exiles and Lebanese Phalangists. A few are legitimate organizations, many are fakes and some are certifiable. Some are blogs, some are empty websites, and many are individuals or small groups listed twice or thrice. At least one, the Muslim Canadian Congress, has repeatedly demanded to be removed from the list, but, true to form, Kamal persists in listing them. Almost all are tiny and on some fringe or other especially a grab-bag of ultra-right crackpots, and many are openly hostile to Islam and Muslims. Stranger than fiction, these are the groups that will be rallying in Washington against terrorism on May 14 under the banner “Free Muslims against Terrorism.”

Whatever it was, the Muslim-bashers are gleefully proclaiming that the sparse turnout means Muslims really are all terrorists.

More on the “Free Muslims” here. Ibish:

It looks like an effort to force people into choosing to give Kamal completely undeserved credibility by joining him, or face possible denunciation as agents of terror by declining the poisoned offer. It’s a typically crude ploy, and nobody should be fooled for a second by it.

The only remaining question is: who is giving Kamal the money to allow him to turn himself out like this, complete with office and staff? Since he still has yet to file his 990 financial disclosure forms, we’ll just have to wait to discover who is the Mac Daddy pimping Kamal, if indeed we ever really find out. If we do, I doubt we’ll be too surprised.

Sounds about right.

Team Bush sends Rice to Iraq

Well, I guess since Rumsfeld’s lecture didn’t work, those recalcitrant Iraqis are in for a real scolding now. Team Bush is sending in the Big Nanny:Rice

ARBIL : US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice made a surprise visit to Iraq to bolster the country’s fledgling government just hours after US troops announced an end to a campaign to rout insurgents near the Syrian border.

As her visit got underway, the discovery of more bodies and a new string of attacks in Iraq underlined the severity of a security situation that has seen hundreds killed this month alone.

Rice arrived in the northern Kurdish city of Arbil on a C-17 military plane from Qatar. She had flown from Washington in utter secrecy, with only a few aides informed of the trip.

So, Rice sneaks into Arbil to lecture the Kurds, first:

The secretary of state flew immediately to Salahuddin, near Arbil, where she was to meet with the Kurdish leader Massoud Barzani, in a convoy of Blackhawk helicopters with Apache escorts.

Then, it’s on to Baghdad for the Shiites’ spanking:

Rice also was slated to meet with Iraq Prime Minister Ibrahim Jaafari and senior cabinet members at 3:00 pm (1100 GMT) in Baghdad before holding a press conference.

On the agenda: Stop de-Baathing all the Sunnis and get tough with the resistance.

“I think it is something that I would like to discuss with the leadership, the composition of that committee, and how (…) they can ensure that there is participation of all Iraqis, including Sunnis, in this process.”
[…]
Rice was unfazed by the wave of violence that has left 400 civilians dead since the start of the month, saying it was an attempt by insurgents to derail the political process and to respond to a major offensive launched against them by Iraqi security forces.

“To defeat them by having a political alternative that is strong,” Rice said the Iraqis were now “going to have to intensify their efforts to demonstrate that the political process is the answer for the Iraqi people.”

There was a major offensive launched by Iraqi security forces? I guess the press didn’t get the memo. Ah, well, it’s just diplo-speak for stop embarrassing us with all these car bombs and assassinations! Start cracking heads like a real government!


UPDATE: Here’s an explanation of the committee to which Rice refers above, by Chris Albritton.

Mona Charen, scourge of the “liberal media”

Is conservative right-wingnuttiness a degenerative disease?

From deep within the echo chamber, Charen rolls out the stock conservative whining points on the Iraqi Oil-For-Food wannabe-scandal (to prove she’s objective, it’s titled “Friends of Saddam”):

Good morning, and welcome to today’s edition of “What’s News?” A Senate committee has released a report alleging that two prominent European opponents of the Iraq War were paid off by Saddam Hussein as part of the U.N. Oil for Food program. I’ll reveal their names in a moment. [Only Mona knows this important information.]

For the record, here’s the story Mona is whining about from the Times (which reported the story hours before the US media but they don’t get credit because they’re British):

Mr Galloway, who overturned a 10,000 Labour majority in Bethnal Green & Bow, dismissed the congressional report last night as a “Republican Party dirty trick”. He repeated his earlier denial that he had received any oil allocations from Iraq.

“For the 500th time, I have never seen a barrel of oil, never owned one, never bought one, never sold one, and neither has anyone on my behalf,” he said. “The Mariam Appeal’s finances were exhaustively investigated by the Charities Commission and nothing improper was found.

“This committee has never written to me, never spoken to me and has not even acknowledged my offer last year to appear in front of them, so it is not much of an investigation.”

Back to Mona:

You will search in vain for this story on the print or Web versions of The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, The Washington Post, or the Chicago Tribune. I found it in The Washington Times and The New York Sun. [Actually, only Mona searched in vain.]

The point here is not to beat up the liberal media for their lack of coverage, but merely to observe that news judgment – that sacred totem of journalism – is not and probably never can be a neutral or unbiased matter.

What the New York Times and New York Sun respectively believe about the world around them is reflected in what they put on the front page – or cover at all.

Since Charen claims to have looked in the NY Times, how could she have missed Old Reliable, Judith Miller:

Hussein Gave Oil to French and British Officials, Senate Panel Says
By JUDITH MILLER
Published: May 12, 2005

Mona, Mona! Don’t you know the NY Times already surrendered to conservative political correctness? Where’s the love?

OK, how about the Washington Post?

Panel Connects Oil Program To Europeans
By Colum Lynch
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, May 12, 2005; A16

The Chicago Tribune?

Committee Releases Oil-For-Food Documents
By NICK WADHAMS
Associated Press Writer
Published May 13, 2005, 7:50 AM CDT

LA Times?

Oil-for-Food Report Alleges Officials Gained
May 12, 2005
By Maggie Farley, Times Staff Writer

Enough, yet?

Unburdened by facts and still cheery after toiling in the archives of the liberal media for our edification, Mona carries on:

That’s why it is essential to get your news from more than one source – preferably from two sources with differing biases. As for me, I like to get both sides of the story – the right and the far right (kidding).

Oh, that Mona – so funny. Just one more example of why conservatives are famous for their sense of humor.