I hate war...for the dictatorships it puts in the place of democracies, and for the starvation that stalks after it.
Harry Emerson Fosdick
Original Blog US Casualties Contact Donate

July 15, 2008

Uyghurs Jailed From Guantanamo to Beijing

by William Fisher

As a federal appeals court ruled that the U.S. military improperly labeled a Chinese Muslim held at Guantanamo Bay an "enemy combatant" and ordered that he be released, transferred, or granted a new hearing, an influential congressional committee delivered a scathing criticism of China's closed trial of 15 men on terrorism charges – resulting in the immediate execution of two defendants, three suspended death sentences, and 10 sentences of life imprisonment.

The men were members of the Uyghur Muslim minority in western China. They have been reliably reported to have been systematically persecuted by Chinese authorities.

The legislators' charges came from leaders of the Congressional Human Rights Committee (CHRC), co-chairs Rep. Jim McGovern, a Massachusetts Democrat, and Virginia Republican Rep. Frank Wolf. The two lawmakers condemned "the harsh pre-Olympic crackdown" in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR) of China.

They also expressed their strong concern over credible reports detailing abuses of due process and rule of law in the July 9 closed trial.

In a statement, Rep. Wolf said, "The Chinese government should not be permitted to use the War on Terror or Olympic security as a front to persecute the Uyghurs These 'trials' appear to be no more than a ploy to oppress religious freedom and ethnic minority groups."

The Uyghurs also made other news in the U.S. last week, when a federal appeals court ruled that the U.S. military improperly labeled Huzaifa Parhat, a Chinese Muslim held at Guantanamo Bay, an "enemy combatant." The court ordered that he be released, transferred, or granted a new hearing.

The ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington marks the first time a federal court has weighed in on the issue of a Guantanamo detainee's classification and granted him the opportunity to try to secure his release through civilian courts.

A lawyer for Parhat, who has been kept virtually incommunicado for more than six years, said he and other members of Parhat's legal team would seek to have him freed immediately.

Parhat is one of 17 Uyghur Muslims still being held at Guantanamo even though the U.S. government acknowledges they pose no threat.

The decision was the latest in a series of legal setbacks for the George W. Bush administration and its efforts to defend the military commissions process at the U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

The order came just days after the Supreme Court ruled that the approximately 270 remaining detainees at Guantanamo have a constitutional right of habeas corpus, which allows them to challenge their detention in federal courts. That ruling marked the third time since 2004 that the nation's highest court has limited the government's power to use the military to detain and prosecute foreign nationals at Guantanamo.

The appeals court specified that Parhat could "seek release immediately" through a writ of habeas corpus in light of the Supreme Court's recent decision. Parhat's case and scores like it had been put on hold until the Supreme Court made its ruling on the habeas corpus issue.

"Now all of these cases have been revived and this is the first case to move forward," David Cole, a constitutional law professor at Georgetown University, told IPS. "And here is somebody that the military has been holding on to for six years and the federal court now says he shouldn't have been held in the first place."

He added, "Absent this independent judicial review, he might have been sitting there for another 10 to 15 years. Now he has a chance to find freedom," said Cole, one of the nation's preeminent constitutional scholars.

Gabor Rona, international legal director for Human Rights First, told IPS, "Mr. Parhat is the poster child who proves that the Supreme Court's decision to restore the right of habeas corpus to Guantanamo detainees is correct. The government's decision to imprison him absent evidence of wrongdoing and without giving him a fair hearing is precisely the harm that habeas corpus is designed to correct."

Religious leaders are also weighing in on the Parhat case. Rev. George Hunsinger of the Princeton University Divinity School told IPS, "The case of Huzaifa Parhat shows beyond reasonable doubt how deeply flawed the process used in Guantanamo truly is."

"Here is a prisoner being detained on the most flimsy of evidence for six long years without a trial. If he were from England rather than China, if his name were Smith or Jones, if he were not a Muslim, would this outrage really be permitted? Why isn't this man being released or at least given a new hearing? The soul of our nation is at stake in how we conduct the so-called 'war on terror,'" he said.

Two years ago, five Uyghurs were released from Guantanamo to seek asylum in Albania, after the United States said it could not return them to China because they would face persecution there. The released Uyghurs live in an Albanian refugee camp, unable to speak the language and forbidden to work.

All of 17 Uyghurs being held at Guantanamo have been cleared for release as part of annual reviews. The government says that, while they are still designated enemy combatants, they are not considered significant threats or "to have further intelligence value."

The Uyghurs are part of a large group of Guantanamo detainees who have been cleared for release, but nonetheless remain in detention. The State Department claims it cannot find countries willing to accept these detainees. U.S authorities have balked at allowing the Uyghurs into the United States.

Parhat, 37, and the other Uyghurs were captured in Afghanistan after the Sept. 11 attacks. He insisted he sought refuge there from an oppressive Chinese government and never fought against the United States. The U.S. government has produced no evidence suggesting that he ever intended to fight, but it designated him an enemy combatant because of alleged links to the East Turkestan Islamic Movement, a separatist group demanding independence from China that Washington says has links to al-Qaeda.

While refusing to return the Uyghurs to China, the U.S. did allow Chinese officials to visit Guantanamo to interrogate the Uyghur detainees.

Despite the court's ruling, Parhat's future is unclear. And while the U.S. government ponders its legal options, Parhat and his 16 fellow Uyghurs continue to live in a cage. According to his lawyers, Parhat wakes at 4:30 or 5:00 a.m., prays, goes back to sleep, walks in circles – north, south, east, west – round his 6-by-12 foot cell for an hour, goes back to sleep for another two or more hours, wakes and reads the Koran or a magazine (written in a language that he does not understand), prays, walks in circles once more, eats lunch, prays, walks in circles, prays, walk in circles, goes back to sleep at 10:00 p.m.

(Inter Press Service)

comments on this article?

  • Obama Faces Spate of 'Terror War' Lawsuits

  • Red Cross Report Bolsters Case for Bush Inquiry

  • Obama Follows Bush on Detainees

  • Senate Committee Weighs 'Truth Commission'

  • Lawsuits Challenge Charity Blacklisting

  • Al-Marri Lawyers Seek Supreme Court Review

  • Britain Admits Complicity in U.S. Rendition

  • What About Bagram?

  • Gitmo Report Contradicts Govt. Claims of 'Humane' Detention

  • Court Passes the Buck on Fate of Chinese Muslims

  • Democrats Divided Over 'Reckoning' for Bush

  • Lawsuit Sheds More Light on Terror War Abuses

  • Rendition Case Enters 'Bizarre' Realms of Secrecy

  • 'State Secrets' Privilege Not Gone With Bush

  • The Children of Guantánamo

  • Study Challenges Claims of Gitmo Recidivism

  • Indefinite Detention Case to Test Obama's Pledges

  • Close Torture Loopholes, Physicians' Group Urges

  • Muslim World Hails End of a Despised Symbol

  • Fate of Guantánamo Detainees Still Murky

  • Bagram: Worse Than Guantanamo?

  • 'Bad Apples' Didn't Fall Far From the Tree

  • Immunity Recedes for Private Contractors in Iraq

  • Ret. Officers Urge Obama to Expunge 'Stain of Torture'

  • Freedom Recedes for Uighurs at Guantanamo

  • Next President Will Inherit Guantanamo Dilemma

  • Muslim Charity to Get
    Its Day in Court

  • The Most Secretive Administration Ever?

  • Muslim Charities Negotiate a Minefield

  • Arar Faces Uphill Legal Battle

  • One-Fifth of Iraq Funding Paid to Contractors

  • Hamdan's Future Remains Unclear

  • NGO 'Blacklist' Unfair and Arbitrary, Groups Say

  • New Spying Law Quickly Challenged

  • Hamdan Case to Test Military Tribunals

  • Uyghurs Jailed From Guantanamo to Beijing

  • 'State Secrets' Privilege Derails Rendition Suit

  • Guantanamo Trials Hit Setbacks

  • Lawmakers Seek Probe of 'Media Generals'

  • Abuse Claims Mount Against Pentagon, Contractors

  • Fabricated 'Bioterrorism' Case Collapses

  • Groups Wrangle with CIA over 'Ghost Prisoners'

  • Courts May Get More Latitude on 'State Secrets'

  • Trials of Muslim Charities Likened to a Witch-Hunt

  • Serious Abuses No Bar to US Military Aid

  • Jordan Acted as Hub for US Renditions, Report Says

  • Arab Govts Ever More Draconian, Group Says

  • Reforms Failed to Curb FBI Spying

  • Former Gitmo Prosecutor to Testify for Defense

  • We Don't Do Torture – Especially in Debates

  • Just Waterboarding Under the Bridge

  • Bush, Congress Wrangle Over Domestic Spying

  • Renditions Clothed in State Secrets Mantle

  • Experts Doubt Fair Trials for Gitmo Suspects

  • Bush's Budget Sidelines Transparency

  • Bush: Uniter, Decider, and Now, Interpreter

  • Congress Seeks to Limit 'State Secrets' Privilege

  • Afghan Prison Looks Like Another Guantanamo

  • Terror Prosecutions Shed More Heat Than Light

  • Legal Community Condemns Destruction of CIA Tapes

  • 'Black Site' Survivor Relates Horrific Tale

  • Bush's New Spin Master
    a Lame Duck?

  • Glaring Hypocrisy of Arab Annapolis Participants

  • Civil Libertarians Warn of 'PATRIOT Act Lite'

  • Gitmo Policy Faces Another Supreme Court Test
  • William Fisher writes for Inter Press Service.

    Reproduction of material from any original Antiwar.com pages
    without written permission is strictly prohibited.
    Copyright 2017 Antiwar.com