As a federal appeals court ruled that the U.S.
military improperly labeled a Chinese Muslim held at Guantanamo Bay an "enemy
combatant" and ordered that he be released, transferred, or granted a
new hearing, an influential congressional committee delivered a scathing criticism
of China's closed trial of 15 men on terrorism charges resulting in
the immediate execution of two defendants, three suspended death sentences,
and 10 sentences of life imprisonment.
The men were members of the Uyghur Muslim minority in western China. They
have been reliably reported to have been systematically persecuted by Chinese
The legislators' charges came from leaders of the Congressional Human Rights
Committee (CHRC), co-chairs Rep. Jim McGovern, a Massachusetts Democrat, and
Virginia Republican Rep. Frank Wolf. The two lawmakers condemned "the
harsh pre-Olympic crackdown" in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region
(XUAR) of China.
They also expressed their strong concern over credible reports detailing abuses
of due process and rule of law in the July 9 closed trial.
In a statement, Rep. Wolf said, "The Chinese government should not be
permitted to use the War on Terror or Olympic security as a front to persecute
the Uyghurs These 'trials' appear to be no more than a ploy to oppress religious
freedom and ethnic minority groups."
The Uyghurs also made other news in the U.S. last week, when a federal appeals
court ruled that the U.S. military improperly labeled Huzaifa Parhat, a Chinese
Muslim held at Guantanamo Bay, an "enemy combatant." The court ordered
that he be released, transferred, or granted a new hearing.
The ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington marks the first time
a federal court has weighed in on the issue of a Guantanamo detainee's classification
and granted him the opportunity to try to secure his release through civilian
A lawyer for Parhat, who has been kept virtually incommunicado for more than
six years, said he and other members of Parhat's legal team would seek to have
him freed immediately.
Parhat is one of 17 Uyghur Muslims still being held at Guantanamo even though
the U.S. government acknowledges they pose no threat.
The decision was the latest in a series of legal setbacks for the George W.
Bush administration and its efforts to defend the military commissions process
at the U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
The order came just days after the Supreme Court ruled that the approximately
270 remaining detainees at Guantanamo have a constitutional right of habeas
corpus, which allows them to challenge their detention in federal courts. That
ruling marked the third time since 2004 that the nation's highest court has
limited the government's power to use the military to detain and prosecute
foreign nationals at Guantanamo.
The appeals court specified that Parhat could "seek release immediately"
through a writ of habeas corpus in light of the Supreme Court's recent decision.
Parhat's case and scores like it had been put on hold until the Supreme Court
made its ruling on the habeas corpus issue.
"Now all of these cases have been revived and this is the first case
to move forward," David Cole, a constitutional law professor at Georgetown
University, told IPS. "And here is somebody that the military has been
holding on to for six years and the federal court now says he shouldn't have
been held in the first place."
He added, "Absent this independent judicial review, he might have been
sitting there for another 10 to 15 years. Now he has a chance to find freedom,"
said Cole, one of the nation's preeminent constitutional scholars.
Gabor Rona, international legal director for Human Rights First, told IPS,
"Mr. Parhat is the poster child who proves that the Supreme Court's decision
to restore the right of habeas corpus to Guantanamo detainees is correct. The
government's decision to imprison him absent evidence of wrongdoing and without
giving him a fair hearing is precisely the harm that habeas corpus is designed
Religious leaders are also weighing in on the Parhat case. Rev. George Hunsinger
of the Princeton University Divinity School told IPS, "The case of Huzaifa
Parhat shows beyond reasonable doubt how deeply flawed the process used in
Guantanamo truly is."
"Here is a prisoner being detained on the most flimsy of evidence for
six long years without a trial. If he were from England rather than China,
if his name were Smith or Jones, if he were not a Muslim, would this outrage
really be permitted? Why isn't this man being released or at least given a
new hearing? The soul of our nation is at stake in how we conduct the so-called
'war on terror,'" he said.
Two years ago, five Uyghurs were released from Guantanamo to seek asylum in
Albania, after the United States said it could not return them to China because
they would face persecution there. The released Uyghurs live in an Albanian
refugee camp, unable to speak the language and forbidden to work.
All of 17 Uyghurs being held at Guantanamo have been cleared for release as
part of annual reviews. The government says that, while they are still designated
enemy combatants, they are not considered significant threats or "to have
further intelligence value."
The Uyghurs are part of a large group of Guantanamo detainees who have been
cleared for release, but nonetheless remain in detention. The State Department
claims it cannot find countries willing to accept these detainees. U.S authorities
have balked at allowing the Uyghurs into the United States.
Parhat, 37, and the other Uyghurs were captured in Afghanistan after the Sept.
11 attacks. He insisted he sought refuge there from an oppressive Chinese government
and never fought against the United States. The U.S. government has produced
no evidence suggesting that he ever intended to fight, but it designated him
an enemy combatant because of alleged links to the East Turkestan Islamic Movement,
a separatist group demanding independence from China that Washington says has
links to al-Qaeda.
While refusing to return the Uyghurs to China, the U.S. did allow Chinese
officials to visit Guantanamo to interrogate the Uyghur detainees.
Despite the court's ruling, Parhat's future is unclear. And while the U.S.
government ponders its legal options, Parhat and his 16 fellow Uyghurs continue
to live in a cage. According to his lawyers, Parhat wakes at 4:30 or 5:00 a.m.,
prays, goes back to sleep, walks in circles north, south, east, west
round his 6-by-12 foot cell for an hour, goes back to sleep for another
two or more hours, wakes and reads the Koran or a magazine (written in a language
that he does not understand), prays, walks in circles once more, eats lunch,
prays, walks in circles, prays, walk in circles, goes back to sleep at 10:00
(Inter Press Service)