October 7, 2003

Meeting Al Jazeera, Hearing Hamid Karzai
by Alan Bock

The war on the war, so to speak, is going rather well these days, with numerous standard journalistic organizations fascinated with the CIA-White House leak and showing signs of eventually getting it right. In addition, the interim report from former UN weapons inspector David Kay was reduced to noting plaintively that the absence of (miscategorized) "weapons of mass destruction" found in Iraq does not mean that there wasn't a potential threat that might have developed sometime.

Hard on its heels came a report from a task force on the Iraqi oil industry which concluded that reconstruction in Iraq is probably going to have to be financed by American taxpayers if it to occur at all. Even though Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz told Congress during the war that "we are dealing with a country that can really finance its own reconstruction, and relatively soon," the more recent assessments of the Iraqi oil industry is that it is unlikely to generate revenues large enough to contribute much to reconstruction for at least a couple of years.

It turns out that the Bush administration, which had announced earlier in the year that Iraq's oil revenues would be $20 billion to $30 billion a year, had taken the most outlandishly optimistic estimates from a preliminary Pentagon task force that had a worst-case-to-best case range and actually thought somewhere between worst and middle was likely. But the Bushies took the best-case estimate (some would call it exaggerated) and used it as part of the overall project of selling the war to the American people. Hmmm. Using exaggeration to get people to go along with your grandiose schemes. Does anybody notice a pattern here?

ADVERTISEMENT FOR MYSELF

I have been doing a radio program out of New Orleans recently (WTIX, AM 690, 8 p.m. Central Sunday evenings) in which (as you might expect) I'm rather critical of the war. I still get calls from listeners complaining that I just don't understand the true nature of the threat we face and the importance of trusting the president and his advisers. If my impressions are correct, however, they are diminishing, and the number of calls from people who are disillusioned with the war is increasing.

Not that this is a "scientific" random sample of the Gulf Coast population of course. What I've really noticed, however, is that it's nice to have facts on your side. It's marvelously disarming. And the Bushies just keep providing us with facts that don't support what they've done.

With the war on the war going so well, I wanted to write this week about a couple of people I had the opportunity to interact with over the last week or so who might be of interest you Antiwar.com readers and contributors, whom we thank very much for keeping us alive.

SCOPING OUT AL JAZEERA

It might surprise some people that the World Affairs Council in Orange County, which has a reputation for being beyond conservative in politics, would be interested in inviting somebody from the Arabic television channel Al Jazeera as a speaker for one of its regular meetings. But while most members of the organization are rather conservative, most are genuinely interested in foreign affairs and relatively open-minded. So they welcomed a speaker from the Washington bureau of Al Jazeera last week and listened carefully to what he had to say.

Most Americans had not heard of Al Jazeera television before 9/11, but in the months following its logo seemed to show up everywhere, most notably on video messages from al Qaida mastermind Osama bin Laden. Is this Arabic satellite news service simply the mouthpiece for radical Islamists and would-be terrorists, or is there more to it than that?

The speaker who visited Orange County last week was Hafez Al Mirazi, Al Jazeera's bureau chief in Washington. The Egyptian-born Mr. Al Mirazi, who has lived in this country since 1983 and is a U.S. citizen, oversees Al Jazeera's coverage of the United States. Not surprisingly, the coverage tends toward foreign policy issues, especially those that pertain to the Middle East, as well as stories on the growing Muslim-American communities in the United States. Not much in the way of fluffy profiles on food, fashion or entertainment in this country. I had a chance to talk with Mr. Al Mirazi one on one, as well as taking pretty careful notes on his speech.

NEW UNDER THE ARAB SUN?

Mr. Al Mirazi says Al Jazeera is something rather new in the Arab world, a news service not run by one of the region's governments and broadcasting only the government line. Although subsidized by the Emir of Qatar, who assumed power in 1995, its charter is modeled on the BBC, which means its editorial policy is independent of the government (ask Tony Blair). Not being fluent in Arabic I can't judge how well it fulfills its mission, but Mr. Al Mirazi says the Emir has not tried to dictate editorial policy.

Many of Al Jazeera's staff came from a joint effort by the BBC and the Saudi government to establish a BBC Arabic World Service in 1994-1995 that eventually failed. Mr. Al Mirazi claims that the channel tries to cover all sides of disputes, and several Arab governments kicked Al Jazeera correspondents out of various countries because it put dissidents or critics of the government in question on the air. While Arab countries could close offices or bureaus, however, they couldn't stop satellite signals from crossing the borders.

Al Mirazi did say, however, that one Arab country arranged for a power blackout when it knew Al Jazeera was going to air a program featuring dissidents and critical of its human rights record. No problem. Al Jazeera simply ran the same program two or three times the next day.

Besides giving air time to Arab dissidents, Al Jazeera was the first Arab TV service to give Israeli officials air time, because they considered it important for Arab viewers to know that there were real people in Israel rather than simply stick figures or stock figures. He believes that this policy has gradually contributed to a small shift in Arab public opinion of acknowledgment that Israel exists and is likely to continue to exist for a while, regardless of brave statements from Arab leaders.

ALLOWING BIN LADEN

Airing tapes from bin Laden, then, is simply part of a policy of showing all sides, says Mr. Al Mirazi, and the station tries to do so responsibly. Every bin Laden tape has been followed immediately by a comment or rebuttal from a U.S. official, and on one occasion the station edited out six minutes that were a direct plea for al Qaida supporters to attack specific U.S. targets in the Middle East. Within a few days, Al Mirazi says, Al Jazeera reporters became aware of hundreds of copies of the unedited tapes being circulated in the areas where targets of interest were. "So bin Laden obviously didn't need Al Jazeera to get his message out to those he really wanted to reach," Mr. Al Mirazi said.

While U.S. officials initially preferred to ignore Al Jazeera or view it almost as a propaganda arm of the enemy, eventually they came to view it as one way to try to reach and perhaps to affect public opinion in the Arab world. Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell and others have gone on Al Jazeera.

A word of caution. Although I've learned some words over the years, I don't speak Arabic and Al Jazeera is not available on the cable system we have at our house, so I can't vouch for what's on Al Jazeera personally. I have talked to Arabic speakers who watch Al Jazeera and say it does air several sides of issues. Hafez Al Mirazi makes a persuasive case that Al Jazeera is exerting a positive influence in the Arab world by giving viewers better access to information. He says it is even contributing to loosening up government controlled TV news in several Arab countries, because the broadcasters can say to their government minders or censors: "You know Al Jazeera is going to cover this story anyway, so you might as well let us air it."

HAMID KARZAI SPINNING

I also had an opportunity to participate in one of those journalist conference calls that have been fairly popular of late as a way to reach journalists in the hinterlands, this one with Afghan president Hamid Karzai. I want one of those cool capes he always wears and I find the man impressive, but I hope I can listen with a certain amount of detachment.

Hamid Karzai, the interim leader of Afghanistan, just announced his candidacy for president during elections scheduled for next year, but he may be facing political revolt as he returns from an extended speaking tour in the United States and Britain during which this phone call was one of the events. Being the clear favorite of he United States might turn out not to be such an asset as Afghanistan begins to develop something resembling normal politics.

The "nation" of Afghanistan is more an artifact of big-power geopolitical maneuvering during the 19th century, of course, than a country that is a logical unity in ethnic or geographic terms. Over the years most of the efforts to unify it under a strong central government in Kabul have been partial successes at best. Local rulers usually hold sway in local areas, as the British, the imperial Russians and later the Soviets discovered to their grief.

As we all came to understand just a little bit during the attack that ousted the militant Islamist Taliban government, the largest ethnic group is the Pashtuns, to which Mr. Karzai was born. But the Northern Alliance, which provided most of the guerrilla and military muscle that pushed the Taliban out of power, consisted mostly of ethnic Tajiks.

Mr. Karzai has brought Tajiks into his government, which has alienated some Pashtuns. It apparently hasn't done much for his standing among Tajiks either. Now some Tajik leaders say they don't support Mr. Karzai for president and seek an alternative candidate.

During his talks in the United States, before the most recent political maneuvering, Mr. Karzai not surprisingly accentuated the positive. He noted that a drought of several years duration has ended and Afghan farmers are expecting the best crops in 25 years. (He did acknowledge that much of it was opium, and he considered the prevalence of opium as an important cash crop was due more to farmers than to tribal "war lords," He didn't offer the outright firm condemnation of opium cultivation a questioners almost certainly really wanted, saying that opium cultivation would probably begin to decline when the rest of the economy improved.)

Highway construction and reconstruction has begun and the government he heads, says Mr. Karzai, is beginning to gain respect outside Kabul. He was especially complimentary of the provincial reconstruction teams, under the auspices of NATO and mostly from New Zealand and Germany, who begun to provide security and some government services in the countryside beyond Kabul.

He did acknowledge, however, that political reconstruction has been slower than hoped. A new constitution was supposed to be ready by now, but has been delayed until December. The election scheduled for June might be only for the national presidency is the machinery is not yet in place to register voters and set up mechanisms for local provincial elections.

The American interest in Afghanistan, of course, is not so much that it become a model democracy as that it doesn't harbor and encourage active terrorists, as the old Taliban regime did. Ironically, a long-term American presence might do more to undermine this goal than a decision to let Afghans run Afghanistan, even if they do it their way rather than our way.

Any decent person wishes Hamid Karzai and Afghanistan well. But as Hamid Karzai told us, "a nation shouldn't depend on one individual. If I'm not elected it might even be a sign of progress." That was before he faced open opposition, of course. According to a story in yesterday's Washington Post he is not at all pleased.

– Alan Bock

comments on this article?

Please Support Antiwar.com

Antiwar.com 520 South Murphy Avenue #202 Sunnyvale, CA 94086

or Contribute Via our Secure Server Credit Card Donation Form

Your contributions are tax-deductible

Antiwar.com
Home Page

Get Alan Bock's book, Waiting to Inhale: The Politics of Medical Marijuana

Alan Bock is Senior Essayist at the Orange County Register and a weekly columnist for WorldNetDaily. He is the author of Ambush at Ruby Ridge (Putnam-Berkley, 1995). He is also author of the new book Waiting to Inhale: The Politics of Medical Marijuana (Seven Locks Press). His exclusive column appears every Tuesday on Antiwar.com.

Archived Columns by Alan Bock

Meeting Al Jazeera, Hearing Hamid Karzai
10/7/03

Remember Bosnia?
9/30/03

Did Bush Destroy the Administration Case for War?
9/23/03

Lifting the Wool: Governments Are Mafias, War Is Their Racket
9/16/03

US in for More Than a Penny in Iraq
9/9/03

Terrorism and Iraq: The Link Is Real Now
8/26/03

Korean Prospects for Peace
8/19/03

Occupation: Counting the True Costs
8/5/03

Wolfowitz Spins the Aftermath
7/29/03

Korean Impressions
7/22/03

Liberia: What American Interest?
7/8/03

A Glimmer of Hope?
7/1/03

Deterring Regime Change in Iran?
6/24/03

Rise of the Apologists
6/17/03

Democracy Through Censorship
6/10/03

On to Iran?
6/3/03

Annika and Peace
5/27/03

The Justifications Crumble
5/20/03

Hard Lessons in Democracy
5/13/03

A Civilian Face on Imperialism
5/6/03

Is Somalia a Model?
4/29/03

Postwar Blues
4/22/03

The Harder They Fall
4/15/03

Picking Up the Pieces
4/8/03

Strange Insistence that No Miscalculations Were Made
4/1/03

Reality Discredits the Chickenhawks
3/25/03

Making Lemonade
3/18/03

Waiting on War
3/11/03

What's the Real Key to Our Freedom?
3/4/03

Korea: Background and Implications
2/25/03

Holding Out for Hope?
2/18/03

The Case Weakens, the Plot Thickens
2/4/03

Criteria for War
1/28/03

On the Eve of War?
1/23/03

Slouching into Iraq?
1/14/03

Can Exile Solve the Saddam Problem?
1/7/03

In Search of a Peace Culture
12/31/02

A Ray of Hope?
12/24/02

Pacifist, Passive or Realistic?
12/17/02

A Slight Detour on the Road to a Police State
12/10/02

The Whitewash Commission
12/3/02

Deck Chairs on the Ship of State
11/26/02

Living in an Inspection Bubble
11/12/02

Turkey's Election: Complications and Blowback?
11/5/02

Destroying the Hostages to Save Them?
10/29/02

Bending Posse Comitatus Brings Bad Results
10/22/02

Pipsqueak Adversaries
10/15/02

War For Frivolous Reasons
10/8/02

A Hunger For War Criticism?
10/1/02

Will War Wreck the Economy?
9/24/02

Don't Take the UN Too Seriously
9/17/02

Preventive or Preemptive War?
9/10/02

Weak Arguments for Attack
9/3/02

Bush Cutting Legal Corners: A Wartime Pattern
8/27/02

Choosing Up Sides
8/20/02

Invasion Complications
8/13/02

U.S. Government Behaving Badly
8/6/02

Homeland Security Horrors
7/23/02

Mixed Signals on Iraq?
7/16/02

Iraqi Warmonger Complications
7/9/02

Assessing the War
7/2/02

Bush: Planning int he Whirlwind
6/25/02

Colombia: Mapping a Quagmire
6/18/02

Roots of Discord
6/14/02

The Empire Strikes First
6/11/02

Underlying Problems in South Asia
6/4/02

Creating A New Axis
5/28/02

The Real Failures
5/21/02

US Wades Into More Imperial Outposts
5/14/02

Convening Futility
5/7/02

Financing Venezuelan Mischief
4/30/02

Chalmers Johnson: Changed Cold Warrior
4/24/02

Meeting Robert Fisk
4/17/02

Arrogance of Empire
4/10/02

Middle East Bloodshed: The US Role
4/3/02

The Terrorists Are Winning
3/27/02

Mideast: The Iraqi Connection
3/20/02

Colombia Vote Presages More Instability
3/13/02

The War Comes Home 3/6/02

Consorting With the Axis of Evil 2/27/02

CIA: Avoiding Reform 2/20/02

The Empire Plans Strikes 2/13/02

Military Pork by the Barrel 2/6/02

State of the Union at War 1/31/02

Guantanamo and Geneva: The Missing Questions 1/30/02

Nation-Building or... 1/23/02

Naming the Beast 1/16/02

Strange Versions of Democracy 1/9/02

Making Artificial Distinctions 1/3/02

The Empire Ruminates 12/28/01

Tracking the War 12/19/01

The Road Not Noticed 12/13/01

New Dangers in the Middle East 12/5/01

Afghan Women and the Northern Alliance 11/28/01

Long and Winding Road Toward Peace 11/21/01

Defending Peacetime 11/7/01

Nagging Questions About the War 10/31/01

Collateral Damage 10/24/01

Wartime Resignation or Endorsement – 10/17/01

Building A Peace Movement In Wartime 10/10/01

Flying the Guarded Skies 10/3/01

Anti-Terrorism for the Long Haul 9/26/01 Impressions Amid the Winds of War 9/19/01

The Price of Empire 9/12/01

War on X When the Metaphor Becomes Too Real 9/5/01

Sticking with an Andean Disaster 8/29/01

Middle East Status is Quo 8/22/01

A Macedonian Fantasy – 8/15/01

FBI Taking Wrong International Path 8/8/01

Defining Terms Unilaterally 8/1/01

European Overtures 7/25/01

Further into the Colombian Morass 7/18/01

Taiwan Changes More Important Than US Policy – 7/11/01

More Confusion Than Closure at The Hague 7/4/01

Testing Government Reliability 6/27/01

Making the Subgrand Tour 6/20/01

The State's Dark Underside 6/13/01

Reassuring Nobody – 6/6/01

Multiplying Balkan Confusion 5/30/01

Powell on Mideast: Seduced or Cynical – 5/23/01

International Aspects of Drug Wars Undercovered 5/16/01

China: Getting Chillier 5/2/01

Previous Columns

Back to Antiwar.com Home Page | Contact Us