More “Wild Charges” about Al Qa Qaa

Click to enlarge pictures, video at the 5 EYEWITNESS NEWS link

Alqaqaapix_04a
Just as the images from inside the Abu Ghraib prison forced the Bush administration to deal with the previously stonewalled allegations of torture in US detention facilities it seems the same thing may happen with the missing explosives controversy.


Using GPS technology and talking with members of the 101st Airborne 5 EYEWITNESS NEWS determined our crew embedded with them may have been on the southern edge of the Al Qaqaa installation, where that ammunition disappeared. Our crew was based just south of Al Qaqaa. On April 18, 2003 they drove two or three miles north into what is believed to be that area.
Alqaqaapix_05a
During that trip, members of the 101st Airborne Division showed the 5 EYEWITNESS NEWS crew bunker after bunker of material labelled explosives. Usually it took just the snap of a bolt cutter to get in and see the material identified by the 101st as detonation cords.Alqaqaapix_07a
“We can stick it in those and make some good bombs.” a soldier told our crew.”




“The senator is making wild charges about missing explosives when his top foreign-policy adviser admits, quote, ‘We do not know the facts,’ ” he [Bush] said at a rally aimed at enlisting Democratic support, with Sen. Zell Miller of Georgia at his side.
“Think about that: The senator is denigrating the actions of our troops and commanders in the field without knowing the facts.”
Alqaqaapix_09a

Actually, we pretty much know how the US takeover of sensitive Iraqi sites went, but Bush is just blowing smoke here. Maybe Kerry’s people don’t know certain facts, like how long the Bushies have been trying to keep the Iraqis quiet about the Al Qa Qaa incident, or where the explosives are or whether any are known to have been used in any of the car bombs exploding all over Iraq, but the fact that the US military not only had no instructions to take over and secure sensitive sites, often they didn’t even know what they were looking at when they arrived at even the most famous ones is indisputably well documented. See this post for a look at the looting of Al Tuwaitha, for an example: True Believers and the Looting of Iraq

UPDATE: IAEA seals being broken by US troops at Al Qa Qaa.

True Believers and the Looting of Iraq

What is it with the warhawks’ sudden recognition of the hypocrisy of the now discarded justification for the invasion of Iraq being to “disarm Saddam?” For an example, Andrew Sullivan, disillusioned Bushie war cheerleader writes:

The reason the story of missing munitions at al Qa Qaa is an important one is not that, in and of itself, it’s a huge deal. As Bill Kristol points out in one of the weakest defenses of the administration yet, the NYT story “didn’t put it into context how important 380 tons are when there are tens of thousands of explosives in the country.” Yes, that’s right. Compared to all the other munitions sites that were looted during and after the invasion, al Qa Qaa is not that devastating. But what about all the other sites? What about the fact that a war begun as a means to restrain Saddam’s weaponry actually helped disperse it? That’s the real issue. And as the facts emerge, I’ve become convinced of one astounding thing: the Bush administration didn’t care very much about the dangers from Saddam’s alleged WMDs, or conventional munitions. Safeguarding those sites, keeping those weapons out of the hands of terrorists, was not a major priority.

Emphasis mine. Where to start? The survey showing that Fox News watchers believe the most false information about the invasion and occupation of Iraq is well known, but surely Sullivan, who’s covered the Iraq debacle obsessively since its inception, has stumbled across some actual factual reporting.It’s been quite clear that the information debunking this justification was available to anyone not willfully blinding themselves. I wrote the following in a debate in June of 2003. It focuses on al Tuwaitha, the major Iraqi nuclear facility: Continue reading “True Believers and the Looting of Iraq”

Theoretical – the ideal candidate

I saw Ron “Spread Liberty at Gunpoint” Bailey take this quiz over at Reason’s Hit & Run blog. The quiz said Bailey should vote for Badnarik and my ideal candidate is Theoretical, which seems about right. There’s no “Nuke Mecca” question or any form of government question that lets you pick “Theocracy” so some Bushbot warmongers probably don’t get sorted out correctly. Bailey, for example, says he’s a Bushman.

My results:

  1. Your ideal theoretical candidate. (100%) Click here for info
  2. Badnarik, Michael – Libertarian (87%) Click here for info
  3. Cobb, David – Green Party (62%) Click here for info
  4. Nader, Ralph – Independent (62%) Click here for info
  5. Peroutka, Michael – Constitution Party (55%) Click here for info
  6. Sharpton, Reverend Al – Democrat (54%) Click here for info
  7. Dean, Gov. Howard, VT – Democrat (49%) Click here for info
  8. Brown, Walt – Socialist Party (44%) Click here for info
  9. Kucinich, Rep. Dennis, OH – Democrat (43%) Click here for info
  10. Kerry, Senator John, MA – Democrat (38%) Click here for info
  11. Clark, Retired General Wesley K., AR – Democrat (37%) Click here for info
  12. Edwards, Senator John, NC – Democrat (36%)

For all you Democrats out there who think I’m going to hell for not voting, if I were to participate in the “democratic process” I’d just vote for some loser libertarian anyway, because there is no way I would ever endorse a pro-war candidate.

Throw all the bums out

Two writers, one from the hell that is Baghdad under Bush and the other from the nascent Police State that is the US under Republican Emperor Dubya the Divine make the case for throwing the current bums out of power in Washington. Lew Rockwell:

Many bad things would happen under a President Kerry. But many horrible things have happened under the Bush presidency. This is a regime that has exploded government power at a pace I hoped we would never see again. Just once I would like to see one of the Bush supporters write something like:

It is true that he has expanded the budget at twice the rate of Clinton, that he has created the largest and most powerful new federal bureaucracy since the WW2, that he has imposed costly protectionist legislation, that he keeps prisoners of war in violation of international law, that he lied about Iraq, that he is personally responsible for the deaths of 1,100 US soldiers, and 15,000+ Iraqi civilians, that his war has inspired terrorism around the world, and that another four years of this can only mean more loss of liberty and more bloodshed. And yet, I support his reelection for fear of Kerry.

But the Bush supporters don’t say that. Instead they liken him to God. They consider him savior. They trust him with leadership. They really credit him with securing the country. They say that he is ruling in the name of liberty. It is remarkable, even demonic. The Bush regime isn’t just a group of leaders vying for our affections. It is the world’s leading example of the cult of power itself. Kerry may be dangerous but he heads no cult and commands no army of deluded religious fanatics willing to celebrate him as he leads the country into a totalitarian hell of endless war and central administration.

Nonetheless, this is not an endorsement. It is an anti-endorsement. Until the day of real freedom arrives, we need both parties so that they might fight among themselves. Better that they point their guns at each other than at us.

Riverbend, in Baghdad Burning:

Who am I hoping will win? Definitely Kerry. There’s no question about it. I want Bush out of the White House at all costs. (And yes- who is *in* the White House *is* my business- Americans, you made it my business when you occupied my country last year) I’m too realistic to expect drastic change or anything phenomenal, but I don’t want Bush reelected because his reelection (or shall I call it his ‘reassignment’) will condone the wars on Afghanistan and Iraq. It will say that this catastrophe in Iraq was worth its price in American and Iraqi lives. His reassignment to the White House will sanction all the bloodshed and terror we’ve been living for the last year and a half.

I’ve heard all the arguments. His supporters are a lot like him- they’ll admit no mistakes. They’ll admit no deceit, no idiocy, no manipulation, no squandering. It’s useless. Republicans who *don’t* support him, but feel obliged to vote for him, write long, apologetic emails that are meant, I assume, to salve their own conscience. They write telling me that he should be ‘reelected’ because he is the only man for the job at this point. True, he made some mistakes and he told a few fibs, they tell me- but he really means well and he intends to fix things and, above all, he has a plan.

Let me assure you Americans- he has NO PLAN. There is no plan for the mess we’re living in- unless he is cunningly using the Chaos Theory as a basis for his Iraq plan. Things in Iraq are a mess and there is the sense that the people in Washington don’t know what they’re doing, and their puppets in Iraq know even less. The name of the game now in Iraq is naked aggression- it hasn’t been about hearts and minds since complete areas began to revolt. His Iraq plan may be summarized with the Iraqi colloquial saying, “A’athreh ib dafra”, which can be roughly translated to ‘a stumble and a kick’. In other words, what will happen, will happen and hopefully- with a stumble and a kick- things will move in the right direction.

So is Kerry going to be much better? I don’t know. I don’t know if he’s going to fix things or if he’s going to pull out the troops, or bring more in. I have my doubts about how he will handle the current catastrophe in Iraq. I do know this: nothing can be worse than Bush. No one can be worse than Bush. It will hardly be fair to any president after Bush in any case- it’s like assigning a new captain to a drowning ship. All I know is that Bush made the hole and let the water in, I want him thrown overboard.

Both Lew and Riverbend emphasize the fact the fanatic partisans devoted to Bush are as dangerous and ludicrously delusional as Bush himself. The combination of this cultish “base” with the evil neocon infestation in positions of power in the Bush administration is clearly worse than the threat Kerry and his supporters pose. I’m with Jacob Sullum, who said “I’d like to see Bush lose, but without Kerry winning.”

May whoever wins be stymied with gridlock at every turn and depart office with as illustrious a list of achievements as Glen Garvin’s (answering Reason magazine’s poll, Who’s getting your vote?) favorite president:

Favorite president: William Henry Harrison caught pneumonia while delivering his inaugural address, lay in bed barely conscious for six weeks, and then died, his presidency having done hardly any damage to the country.

Dying for a Mistake

Today’s dedication ceremony and reenactment in Balaclava, Ukraine, in honor of the valiant charge by British cavalry during the Crimean War brings to mind once again Alfred, Lord Tennyson’s stirring poem of heroic duty. “The Charge of the Light Brigade” has immortalized the consequences of a mistaken command on a battlefield; a “blunder,” as Tennyson puts it. How this poem thrilled me as a child before I was aware of the true nature of war, how the horsemen of the Light Brigade bravely charged the enemy cannons even though they knew they had been given a suicidal order by mistake.

Who will be the poet to immortalize our brave troops in Iraq? They too are charging into harm’s way based on a huge mistake, a momumental blunder; a war based on erroneous data and out-and-out lies, a war which should never have been started. No one questions the courage of our troops, and a proud nation salutes their sense of duty. But again, will there be a great poet to immortalize their sacrifice, or will they be silently forgotten to history as an uncomfortable reminder of a great mistake in judgment?

Read the poem, and think of our troops over in Iraq:
The Charge of the Light Brigade

Failure to secure…

In light of today’s horrendous news that 380 tons (760,000 pounds) of high explosives seem to have been “mislaid” in the aftermath of the war in 2003, I was reminded of a blog entry I posted in January 2004 which dealt with a similar theft, only then it was about radioactive waste and its devastating effect on one small Iraqi villiage. The cause was the same, failure to secure dangerous materials. Of course, great care was taken at that same time by the military to secure the buildings of the Iraqi Oil Ministry.

Here is Dahr Jamail’s original story “Who Will Give Us Back Our Health”