US Sending Iraq $11 Billion in Arms, Despite Maliki’s Turn Towards Dictatorship

Pointing out Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki’s turn towards dictatorship is no longer a fad for opposition members of parliament and voiceless Iraqi subjects. Now it’s so blatant that it’s recognized by everyone. Even the New York Times.

The Obama administration is moving ahead with the sale of nearly $11 billion worth of arms and training for the Iraqi military despite concerns that Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki is seeking to consolidate authority, create a one-party Shiite-dominated state and abandon the American-backed power-sharing government.

The military aid includes things like advanced fighter jets and battle tanks and, as best I can tell, is in addition to the $82 million in arms and equipment the U.S. sent to Baghdad in October.

It’s true that Maliki has shown signs of solidifying some level of authoritarian rule, and it isn’t particularly new. He has circumvented Parliament, consolidated illegitimate power in a long trend of quasi-dictatorial behaviorharshly cracked down on peaceful activism, harassed and even attacked journalists that were critical of his regime, and has been accused of torturing prisoners in secret Iraqi jails.

In September, Iraqi cleric Moqtada al-Sadr issued a statement accusing Maliki of “building a new dictatorship.” That same month, Iraq’s head of the Integrity Commission Raheem Uqaili resigned and wrote an open letter accusing the Maliki regime of unutterable corruption and power grabs. Just this month, Iraq’s Deputy Prime Minister Saleh al-Mutlaq warned in a CNN interview that Maliki is “going towards dictatorship.” Less than a week later Maliki ordered Iraq’s Sunni Vice President Tareq al Hashemi detained on trumped up terrorism charges, in a broader plan to marginalize Sunni authorities in government. Finally, former Iraqi Prime Minister Ayad Allawi co-authored article in the New York Times this week, along with fellow Iraqiya members Osama al-Nujaifi (Iraq’s parliament speaker) and Finance Minister Rafe al-Essawi, warning that Maliki is taking the nation down the path of “sectarian autocracy.”

In light of this, should we be surprised that Washington continues to send Iraq billions of dollars in aid and billions more in military weaponry? No, I don’t think so. In a diplomatic cable released by WikiLeaks, US envoy Ryan Crocker noted in 2009 that Maliki’s turn towards more centralized rule is “in US interest.” Even after Obama’s attempts to extend large-scale military occupation were rejected, ongoing responsibilities after the withdrawal still include carrying out “two of the largest Foreign Military Sales (FMS) and Foreign Military Financing (FMF) programs in the world and to spend the $2.55 billion in Iraq Security Forces Fund (ISFF).”

This is literally what it means to receive U.S. economic and military support in a strategically important region. How many foul, tyrannical, genocidal dictatorships does America have to avidly prop up for people to stop being surprised about it?

24 thoughts on “US Sending Iraq $11 Billion in Arms, Despite Maliki’s Turn Towards Dictatorship”

  1. Another impoverished country forced to spend all its spare resources on useless weaponry. This would be like a guy with a $20K / year job spending half a million on an armored personnel carrier to threaten his next door neighbor.

  2. I'm just glad Mr. Maliki was generous enough to 'allow' 700 US troops to remain in Iraq to train his military on the US taxpayers' dime. The Mujahedeen are currently showing their gratitude for this in Afghanistan.

  3. what iraq needs is $11 billion in depleted uranium detoxification equipment and UN supervised clean up teams

  4. It really means: "US Sending Iraq $11 Billion in Arms, Because of Maliki´s Turn Towards Dictatorship"

  5. Do you know that Income is the consumption and savings opportunity gained by an entity within a specified time frame, which is generally expressed in monetary terms

  6. Hedge funds performed terribly last year. I don't think they are "hedged" at all. How are they different from mutual funds (other than charging an arm and a leg for their services)?

  7. The Benefits of a Hedge Fund are funds Allows access to a broader spectrum of leading hedge funds that may otherwise be unavailable due to high minimum investment requirements.

  8. Yeah, because we all know that Obama the Peace Laureate is going to end the wars, evacuate the military bases, bring the troops home and shrink the military down to the size necessary only for territorial defence.

  9. W przypuszczaj?cym co? ko?o tego 1000 adresów prototypie nakazy odnalaz?y si? podobnie notacje, które rzeczywi?cie ulepszaj? regu?y wizy do usa przyst?pienia do VWP, ?e mog?aby do niego wst?pi? Lechistan. – Wcze?niej powinni?my podeprze? kanon, przechowa? brzegi tak?e tworzy? struktura ochraniania jednostek wje?d?aj?cych a wyruszaj?cych spo?ród Stany zjednoczone, oraz nie wcze?niej nast?pny kwalifikowa? si? na amnesti? – s?dzi Camarota.

    Zameldowany przez ponadpartyjn? wizy do usa wspólnot? senatorów hipoteza nakazy imigracyjnej zosta? w maju otrzymany wielk? wi?kszo?ci? opinij w poprzek senack? komisj? przejawu praworz?dno?ci. Nie wizy do usa egzystowa?o wizy do usa w takim razie opatentowa? ani korektur do zapisów o VWP. Na forum kompletnego Senatu streszczenie dojdzie najprawdopodobniej mniej wi?cej 10 czerwca.

Comments are closed.