Bradley Manning Trial Day 2

The court martial of Pfc. Bradley Manning on charges that could land the celebrated Army whistleblower in prison for life, enters Day Two at the Fort Meade courtroom in Maryland on Tuesday.

Credit: William Hennessy/AP
Credit: William Hennessy/AP

Check in with Kevin Gosztola and Alexa O’Brien, who are both covering the proceedings, for regular updates and commentary.

According to Gosztola, here and here from Day 1 of the trial, it is clear that the government will be painting Manning as an arrogant, small man who “dumped” a load of classified info on the Internet, despite being trained on the consequences of allowing such information to get into the wrong hands.

Gosztola describes the Army’s opening salvo:

[Military prosecutor Capt. Joe Morrow] declared, “This is not a case about a government official” making discreet disclosures. It is a case about a soldier who “literally dumped” information on the Internet “into the hands of the enemy.” It is a case about “what happens when arrogance meets access to information.”

Morrow added that Manning’s training repeatedly had warned him of the “enemies’ use of the Internet writ large.” He had conducted research that warned him of the “enemies’ use of WikiLeaks.” He knew the dangers of “unauthorized disclosure to an organization like WikiLeaks and he ignored that evidence.”

Manning violated superior officers and engaged in an act to the “aid of our adversaries.” He used his military training to “gain notoriety.” He “knew the consequences of his actions and disregarded that for self-interest…(clip)

Manning, the military prosecutor argued, knew there was a “great value to our adversaries and in particular our enemies.”

 

Most interestingly — though not surprising — it appears the government will spend the next 12 weeks trying to convince the jury that not only was Manning fully cognizant that his actions would “aid the enemy” — the “enemy” being al Qaeda — but that he conspired with Julian Assange and WikiLeaks to do it.

The leitmotif in this ongoing tragedy is that the government is looking for a way to finally prosecute Assange, who is living under Ecuadoran asylum in that country’s embassy in London. WikiLeaks in currently under investigation by the U.S Justice Department. Many believe the government is trying to prove that Assange helped Manning obtain, store and release the documents, which would make him a co-conspirator rather than merely the recipient of more than 700,000 classified U.S documents. Manning has adamantly denied this co-conspiracy scenario, but has admitted handing the files to WikiLeaks after being turned down by major American newspapers. WikiLeaks has neither confirmed nor denied it got the documents from Manning.

The government argued that a “pressassociation” account on Jabber was used by WikiLeaks editor-in-chief Julian Assange himself and seemingly suggested that Manning had been “enlisted” to “help” WikiLeaks obtain copies of documents on the “Most Wanted” list (something the defense heavily disputed prior to Morrow’s opening argument).

Though no proof has been presented that Assange was actually using the “pressassociation” account, the government appears prepared to go forward and argue this as fact during the trial.

Also, the government claimed that chat logs showed Manning had “enlisted Assange’s help in figuring out a way to browse” the secret network with information “anonymously.” The government also suggested that Manning had helped WikiLeaks edit the “Collateral Murder” video.

The government’s argument went witness by witness and through each set of documents chronologically detailing all that the government plans to show over the course of the trial. It was a broad overview of what can be expected.

For their part, Manning’s defense posed the 25-year-old Manning as naive yet determined to do the right thing, according to Gosztola’s reporting. It was his experience in Iraq — which has been well documented as Manning’s initiation into civilian killing, U.S-condoned torture, the dehumanizing ritual of watching Collateral Murder-like videos over and over in the intelligence centers for which he worked:

[Defense attorney David] Coombs described Manning as “not the typical soldier.” He had custom dog tags that said on the back “Humanist,” a “religious belief he ascribed to and those values are placing humans first, placing value on human life.” …(clip)

Coombs said Manning struggled not only with his obligation and duty to people but also with an internal struggle. This led him to decide he “needed to do something to make a difference in the world. He needed to do something to help improve what he was seeing .”

He began to select info that he believed “the public should hear and should see.” As Coombs said, “If public,” it would “make the world a better place.” And he specifically selected documents he believed could not be used “against the United States” and “could not be used” to the advantage of a foreign nation.

Manning has already pled guilty to 10 lesser charges, but the government in its infinite zeal to make an example of the young man, is going for the one that brings with it the life sentence — aiding the enemy. It will call 141 witnesses for the prosecution, many testifying behind closed doors. In a statement, Assange suggested it was nothing more than a kangaroo court:

This is not justice; never could this be justice. The verdict was ordained long ago. Its function is not to determine questions such as guilt or innocence, or truth or falsehood. It is a public relations exercise, designed to provide the government with an alibi for posterity. It is a show of wasteful vengeance; a theatrical warning to people of conscience.

Conspiracy to commit journalism.

16 thoughts on “Bradley Manning Trial Day 2”

  1. I don't really see how Manning's actions can aid the enemy. Don't TV execs who broadcast Jersey Shore aid the enemy too?

    My point is that Manning didn't get in contact with some terrorists and say "Hey, the Americans are located over there and they're relaxing so here's your chance to attack them." All he did was expose the horrible truth and embarrass mainly the US government, and some others. His actions were a catalyst for the Arab Spring (e.g.Tunisia) but now McCain and co openly want to aid the Syrian "rebels"/freedom fighters/insurgents/terrorists/etc.

  2. The adverarary or enemy the government did not want to see Bradleys information was non other than the American people . We are the governments enemy when it comes to information like this .
    Why didn't we prosecute the soldier that blew the whistle on Lt Calley in Nam ?

  3. Here.., Al-Queada considered to be the enemy.., If government only could come up with the website of
    al-Queada or other terrorist organization which this patriot solder had contact with and given the military secret informations…, or provided any form of logistic or otherwise information then and for the first time the prosecutor-government are right about the facts in this case. Otherwise this solder has used his patriotic thoughts informing the American people about the brutality, a dictatorial acts of a militarism regime acting to its fullest stands to prove its supremacy toward the Iraqi nations by killing them.

    A million Iraqi babies were killed by the USA adopted sanction.., the brutality of a democratic president and his staff were shown on a tv show when Madeline Albright was asked the question…, she simply didn't care.., that tells me that such "democracy" word have no meaning so is the system adopted justice.

  4. Please help support freedom of the press and freedom of information by sponsoring Julian Assange for the Nobel prize for freedom of the press: Google: Avaaz.org "Julian Assange for Nobel prize "Freedom of the Press"" and vote!
    PLEASE HELP PROMOTE THIS LINK.If we fail to protect the "Assanges" of the world, we condemn ourselves to tyranny. More than, 500 people, from all over the world, have already voted; be the next to add your voice to freedom of the press!

  5. . so like if the USA were rounding up Iraqi Civillians, loading them into train cars, and then gassing them to death in concentration camps… according to the people wanting Manning to be found guilty, then all the USA would have to do is stamp 'CLASSIFIED' on it, and the only crime they would think that was occurring is if someone actually brought up the fact we were running death camps!?

    why are they prosecuting the person who provided footage of the murder, and not the murderers?

  6. The adverarary or enemy the government did not want to see Bradleys information was non other than the American people . We are the governments enemy when it comes to information like this .

  7. Hi my friend! I want to say that this article is awesome, nice written and include almost all significant infos. I¡¦d like to see more posts like this .

  8. Wow!! conspicuously your posted letters is applauded adept. I am too leveraged to read this article. I understanding you a lot of congrats for your very proceeded mail. Just advance ahead.

  9. I like the conceiving technique. it's simply perfect. The diary announce letters is extremely connective and appealing. All the details edit my dissertation and figures I known in sent remarks is extremely cooperative. Thanks a lot.

  10. Word of love and appreciation and greeting fulfillment and private
    Greeting fill all the meanings of brotherhood and friendship
    Greetings from the Heart to Heart
    Thank you with all my heart
    GREAT ARTICLE TNX FOR WORK I LOVE THIS
    ????? ???
    and welcom to d great blog for cooking gamesmùm*m

Comments are closed.