Rand Paul to Hold Up Another Obama Nominee Over Drone Memos

Rand Paul may be on another collision course with the Obama administration over the issue of drones. According to Reason‘s Matt Feeney, Paul “has warned Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) that he will put a hold on one of President Obama’s appellate court nominees over his role in crafting justification of the assassination of Anwar al-Awlaki…”

Rand Paul really rose to prominence following his 13-hour filibuster that held up the nomination of John Brennan to CIA Director. Paul delayed the confirmation until the administration answered his questions about the circumstances that must be met for the president to approve killing Americans with drones. Attorney General Eric Holder eventually answered him (read about that here). A chilling white paper was leaked to NBC news laying out the legal case for the Awlaki killing, and after that, in May, Holder sent a letter to Sen. Pat Leahy laying out their legal interpretations of the issue.

Incidentally, this hasn’t been enough for civil liberties advocates. Last month, in a case brought by the ACLU and the New York Times, a federal appeals court “ordered the release on Monday of key portions of a classified Justice Department memorandum that provided the legal justification for the targeted killing of a United States citizen, Anwar al-Awlaki.” The government has not fulfilled the court order yet and could still appeal the decision, taking the case to the Supreme Court.

Rand Paul’s decision to hold up the nomination of former Justice Dept. official David Barron will put pressure on the administration to obey the court and release the memos. It tough to predict if it will cause the administration to relent, but surely much of it depends on how determined Paul is – who will blink first?

6 thoughts on “Rand Paul to Hold Up Another Obama Nominee Over Drone Memos”

  1. This may be little more than posturing on Rand Paul's part, but it's good to see someone in Congress at least appear to be doing something to hold the Obama administration accountable.

    1. Rand Paul seems to be the only member of congress to even attempt to stem the tide of neo-cons, hawks, and amoral self-servers appointed by Barack Obama. A majority of senior White House administrators and cabinet officials are neo-cons. A blunt statement but anyone interested can find the information about govt personnel without much trouble.
      My major quarrel with Obama's nomination of David Barron is the immoral and unconstitutional legal opinions he wrote supporting selective/elective murder. Another issue is Obama's penchant for appointing only non-moslems, non-Asiatics, and non-Christians. This is troubling. Again, doubters can readily find the information to see for themselves. Don't take this writer's word for it. Investigative reports have long since been relegated to the sidelines, so it is up to each and every interested or concerned American to do a little reading and a little fact checking for themselves.
      Finally, I am irritated that the writer of this article gave so little factual information for the enlightenment of his readers. Another journalist sidelined by fear.

  2. Rand Paul he is a genius, "he decided to defer confirmation until the administration answers your questions about the case to be met for approval of the president of Americans killed with machine fly "this all has his reasons, I believe him.

  3. In our haste to take advantage of technology for fast economic benefit, we frequently lose sight of the long-term penalties: the upper order and oblique results, especially the delayed and unintended results of technology. Allow us to introduce the term malefit to signify harmful results and penalties of a know-how in contrast with benefit as a helpful output. http://www.cycletowalk.com/

Comments are closed.