ISIS Is Spreading Because the US Is Repeating Its Mistakes

On October 7th, Bloomberg reported that ISIS is spreading to Kobani, a crucial Syrian city bordering Turkey. Kobani’s fall to ISIS would means that the terrorist group has secured over 100 kilometers of land connecting Syria and Turkey. US officials are downplaying the significance of the current battle, but the militaristic importance is clear: ISIS is spreading, and there’s little the United States can do to stop it.

It’s been said time and again that the ongoing crisis with ISIS is similar to the United States’ conflict with al Qaeda. Like last time, we’re faced with a stateless, fundamentalist terrorist group that has grappled the media’s attention because of the needless killings they have committed. Amazingly, while polls suggest that Americans are uncomfortable with boots on the ground in affected countries, they are still overwhelmingly rallying around policies that have been demonstrably ineffective over the past thirteen years. Unfortunately, the media is right. The problems with ISIS directly mirror Iraq and Afghanistan, but policy makers should have learned from our undefined goals, intelligence gaffes, and misuse of the military before confronting another non-state actor.

Ultimately, the United States is treating ISIS like a country instead of an idea taking hold of people across territories around the globe. This disconnect between the US’s strategy and the reality of the battle it’s fighting will lead, and has led, to the ultimate failure of America’s military objectives in the Middle East.

Firstly, the US still does not understand the nature of guerilla warfare. This lesson has been taught time and again, starting with the Tet Offensive but bears repeating. America’s military is well-equipped for state enemies with clear borders and objectives. In Iraq and Afghanistan, the United States would destroy Taliban or al Qaeda leadership, only to make "no tactical gains."

However, territory is not at the heart of ISIS’s mission; influence is. If the wars of the past decade have proved anything, it’s that the United States cannot beat back ideas with bombs.

Secondly, during the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, American policy makers lacked clear purpose. Chuck Hagel noted in early 2013, "One of the reasons we’re in trouble in Afghanistan is because we went well beyond our mission." President Obama’s mission for destroying ISIS is colored with rhetoric. He calls the group a "major counterterrorism operation" and wants to “degrade and destroy” it. But what does that mean for our troops? Just like when President Bush called for a "War on Terror," there are no clearly defined goals for the ISIS mission. This is an invitation for scope creep.

If having ill-defined goals isn’t detrimental enough, the US is acting on faulty intelligence yet again. Saddam Hussein did not have weapons of mass destruction. Pakistan turned out to be more of an enemy than an ally. US intelligence agencies failed to collaborate with other allies’ intelligence groups, leading to massive failure in Afghanistan. Unremarkably, the intelligence failures led to "a mismatch between forces, capabilities, missions, and goals," according to an assessment from the Pentagon’s Joint Staff.

The federal government should have learned this lesson last time, but it didn’t. American policymakers were shocked when they learned that ISIS could assemble "between 20,000 and 31,500 fighters across Iraq and Syria" – far more than the original 10,000 predicted before President Obama addressed the nation. As ISIS continues to grow, the President is already blaming intelligence agencies and their leadership for the failures.

Finally, during the wars with Afghanistan and Iraq, policy makers relied heavily on the US’s relative power to justify recommended foreign policy. Hubris, unfortunately, does not win wars or engagements – not in the past and not today. In 2001 and 2003, the US enjoyed the same economic and military hegemony as it does now, but, as this country should have learned in its prior two wars, "staying the course" does not guarantee lasting success. As David Rothkopf writes in Foreign Policy, "The [US] faces financial constraints. There are limits to what its allies are willing to support. There are cultural, historical, geographical, and demographic obstacles that the United States can never surmount."

Those same financial, cultural, and geographical hurdles still exist today. When confronting ISIS, President Obama has limited the military to airstrikes only. While airstrikes are particularly good at destroying a state’s economy, has a weak history of toppling states let alone stateless institutions such as ISIS.

Additionally, our allies suffer from cultural problems. A report from Strategy Page notes that the ground troops at our disposal – largely from allied Middle Eastern states – are "demoralized," particularly if they’re from Iraq. Air support will do little if there are no effective ground troops to finish the job.

It’s clear that the ISIS conflict bares incredibly close resemblances to Iraq and Afghanistan. Unfortunately, US policy makers’ approaches to defeating ISIS will be just as ineffective as they have been since 2001, and for the very same reasons. It’s time for the United States to reevaluate its strategy before its caught in another never-ending war.

Rachel Burger is a Young Voices Advocate living in Washington, DC.

18 thoughts on “ISIS Is Spreading Because the US Is Repeating Its Mistakes”

  1. If ISIS is such a threat, why are our "allies" so reluctant to get involved? Why isn't Turkey, which is right next to the battleground, sending its army into Iraq/Syria to eliminate this terrible threat? Nobody seems to care very much.

    And as for Americans rallying around failed policies, Americans will rally around anything as long as somebody else does the fighting and they don't have to pay for it. If it is free, they are for it.

    1. There was an article on this website a few months ago, when "ISIS" first gained notoriety, to just that effect. Good acronym for "Israeli Secret Intelligence Service". ISIS is another fine production by the Mossad/CIA cartel. Otherwise, how is it that they came out of nowhere, started rolling up all opposition, are so well trained and funded from the get go, rely on social media for recruitment purposes, and the much vaunted NSA hasn't a clue as to where their hiding, training etc.? ISIS is the Feds brand new bogeyman for their pro Israel foreign policy and they're milking it for all its worth. Meanwhile, hardly a day doesn't go by where MSM reports that "a gazillion __ citizens" have gone to the ME to join ISIS. Sure. They can't pin the organization down but MSM and intelligence agencies know from day to day who's joining, how many and from where. No, don't believe a bit of it. They certainly exist but they're a scam. Consider, they've been raising hell with their own coreligionists from the get go but have yet to do so much as break wind or throw a spitball in the direction of Israel. Israel should be the #1 target for any self respecting ME terrorist organization. Why is ISIS giving them a bye? See above for the real meaning of their name. They're a neocons wet dream for sure and they've allowed the all Israel US foreign policy to get back on track conquering the ME for Israel starting with taking down Assad. Just about a year ago those plans were were derailed by Putin's intervention. Now it would seem they're right back to where they want them.

      1. A year ago Obama was prevented from bombing Syria and he, along with Kerry, were made to look foolish. They didn't forget. Another way had to be found, and ISIS fit the bill perfectly. No need for the "exceptional nation" to get international approval. Let's not forget that Obama's ultimate goal is not the defeat of ISIS but the removal of the Assad regime.

  2. I think the US still does not understand the nature of guerilla warfare. This lesson has been taught time and again, starting with the Tet Offensive but bears repeating. America’s military is well-equipped for state enemies with clear borders and objectives.

  3. "Firstly, the US still does not understand the nature of guerilla warfare."

    Never a truer phrase has been uttered.

  4. The writer brings up SECDEF Hagel's opposition to the way the Afghan war was expanded.. Mr. Raimondo declared that Hagel, because of his objection to GWB's invasion of Iraq, would change the face of US war policy. Petitions were signed at Antiwar to get him confirmed over insane McCain's objections. Change sure didn't happen, did it? Hagel fell right in line with the other careerists. Might as well keep padding that fat pension, right Chuck? And, like Panetta, write a book about your disagreements with Obama AFTER you leave your post.

  5. I completely agree, isis is not real and there is nothing really happening in the middle east. There is no killing or war. I hear they are all sitting around drinking tea and trying to figure out how may people they are going to claim were wrongfully killed by the end of the day. I hear they pick straws to decide whose number they give to the media.
    Obviously people are not this foolish or violent, so the images of war are being produced in Hollywood. The politicians claim the war is real and are actually diverting the monies allotted for the war effort to their personal bank accounts.
    None of this is real cause we are stuck in the matrix, it is you choice of blue or red pill.

  6. So, Alice is able to get started in discussing the household finances with her husband Mark and their kids. She believes that by using the following pointers her household shall be nicely on their option to improving their family financial objectives. That will appear redundant if you find yourself planning a family history search. We additionally play family video games every Thanksgiving and Christmas.

  7. Now you've some great ideas to try when you need to spend some high quality time together as a family. Store on-line and see our enormous choice of bamboo image frames in a large assortment of sizes and types.

  8. With this thirst for communication, a lot of options have emerged for the family unit and it is potential to choose among the best family mobile phone plans out there whilst reaching real financial savings. Visit us online and see our archival photograph frames now or call us at 800-780-0699.

  9. As a result of the stylized representations which we now consider as being family crests originated as shows on top of precise armored helmets, there was no mechanism to ever create a household crest for a woman or clergyman.

Comments are closed.