“Stop Watching Us”: Who Get Pardoned?

The maligned Warren Harding commuted Eugene V. Debs’ prison sentence and then invited the socialist anti-war felon to join him for breakfast in the White House. Gerald Ford pardoned Nixon, who otherwise might have landed in Leavenworth. George H.W. Bush pardoned Elliott Abrams after Iran-Contra. Bill Clinton, neither moralist nor saint, pardoned the fugitive crook Marc Rich. Barack Obama, who forgave all our chicken hawks, neocons, and torture lovers who lied us into Iraq, has offered not one word of understanding about the hard choices taken by Edward Snowden and Chelsea Manning except to say he didn’t “think Mr. Snowden was a patriot” and that Manning “broke the law.”

Snowden, though, has enthusiasts who applaud his dissemination of material about Americans spying on Americans. Like the anonymous sculptors (why anonymous? Who are they afraid of?) who put up a sculpture of Snowden in Brooklyn’s Fort Green Park, which frantic park employees rushed to cover up before hauling it away. 0r Mozilla, a software collective, which Jill Lepore, the intrepid Harvard historian and New Yorker essayist reports, have begun an online petition, “Stop Watching Us,” to be sent to Congress saying that Snowden’s disclosures were about a “type of blanket data collection by the government [which] strikes at bedrock American values of freedom and privacy.” Good luck, Mozilla, especially with so many troglodytes seated on the right side of the House and Senate, and so detached a president.

It goes without saying (0f course, I exclude the capital’s many war lovers and its heavily subsidized neocon home front heroes) that without 9/11 and Iraq, our latest era of mindless hysteria, careerism, profit-making, military adventurism, and public apathy, no online petition or park sculpture would have been necessary. Our vaunted “intelligence community” and political class which has helped bury tens of thousands of American soldiers, plus countless Asian and Mideastern civilians, now has to contend with Snowden, the deceptively mild-mannered and very smart techie, a libertarian who voted for Ron Paul in 2012, and who did what he did without asking for a handout. In Washington, the center of an empire awash with bribers and piles of money, few skeptical pundits, special interests, greed and opportunities galore, not many want to jeopardize their careers by fretting publicly about the exiled Snowden or Chelsea Manning’s draconian prison sentence. So that leaves us with Barack Obama who rarely offers any pardons.

A new and sympathetic book “The Snowden Reader” has just appeared. David P. Fidler, James Louis Calamaras Professor in the Maurer School of Law at Indiana University, its editor, has a perfect dedication for our perplexing and troubled times: “To my students, whose generation has so much at stake when national security dangers, innovative technologies, and commitment to civil liberties converge.”

One of the book’s writers, Nick Cullather, professor of history at Indiana, says Snowden’s most politically embarrassing and harmful revelation was “the complicity of the watchdogs charged with protecting the public interest, the oversight [congressional] committees, and the FISA court which “acquiesced when the NSA overstepped even the residual safeguards left standing after 9/11.” Indiana U’s political scientist William E.Scheuerman argues, “Snowden’s actions meet most of the demanding tests outlined in political thinking about civil disobedience,” citing his “moral and political seriousness.” And more: “The Obama administration’s abrupt cancellation of his passport rendered him effectively stateless, dependent on a Russian government…at the whim of a former KGB spymaster.”

And finally, in addition to the raft of valuable documents included — suitable for curious teachers and students from high school through graduate school — we have Lee Hamilton, who from 1965 to 1990 served in Congress where he chaired House committees on foreign affairs and intelligence and later served as vice-chair of the 9/11 national commission. Hamilton, the politician, is tough and unforgiving. “The amount of misinformation from the government on surveillance programs has simply been astounding and appalling.” About the national director of national intelligence who allegedly lied to Congress, Hamilton pours it on: “I am still waiting for the attorney general to indict him for a clear-cut case of perjury.” By this administration?

Realistic about the way Washington works, he writes that, given voters’ short and waning memories, the diversions of popular culture and the flood of one-sided views, people will lose interest and the status quo, with a few minor alterations, will win out. The misnamed Patriot Act’s successor, the USA Freedom Act, promises to respect the Fourth Amendment. But the new law could vanish the moment there’s a real or imagined terrorist attack and panic-stricken responses may again become the preferred law of the land. For Hamilton, “The lack of outrage [among Americans} is palpable and perhaps signals they accept the expansion of government power…and appear to favor security over liberty.”

Meanwhile, I’m waiting for a companion book, “The Manning Reader.” Snowden once called Manning “a classic whistleblower,” a category unappreciated by an Obama White House dedicated to relying on Woodrow Wilson’s archaic Espionage Act. Compare Obama’s indifference to the very harsh treatment, bordering on torture, given Manning in the Marine brig at Quantico and then read how in contrast his courageous subordinate, P.J. Crowley, a State Department press spokesman, quit in protest.

From her cell, Manning has been an occasional columnist for the US and UK Guardian newspapers (she also has a Twitter account). In one Guardian column she explained why she released unclassified but “sensitive” material that bared possible American war crimes. Another Guardian column had a subhead, “Americans need to know more about the battles fought in their name,” the last thing many of our doyens want.

She also wrote an Op-Ed in the NY Times in June 2015 (“I chose to disclose classified information in 2010, I did so out of a love for my country and a sense of duty to others”).When none of her superiors seemed to care about the secret Collateral Murder video, showing a US Apache helicopter killing defenseless Iraqi civilians and two Reuters newsmen, she sent the video to WikiLeaks. She also sent WikiLeaks an “Afghan War Diary,” about civilian deaths and wounded.

It would be a simple act of justice if Barack Obama pardoned both of them before he left office. But that will take “audacity.” Even so, I’m still hoping.
UPDATE: On May 8th I wrote “The Great Deal David Petraeus Got Shows a Double Standard at Work.” Now one month later comes news that a group of media organizations (The AP, Bloomberg, Dow Jones, Charlotte 0bserver, First Look Media, NPR, NY Times, the Washington Post and the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press) have urged the court to make public all materials connected to the sentencing. As Hannah Bloch-Wehba wrote in News Media Update on June 8th: “The secrecy in Petraeus’s case was also unusual. In other prosecutions of defendants who have pleaded guilty to charges related to alleged leaks of classified information, sentencing-related documents have been made public. And Petraeus’s position as a former high-ranking military officer and public official made his prosecution especially noteworthy.” Stay tuned.

14 thoughts on ““Stop Watching Us”: Who Get Pardoned?”

  1. its funny that obama fits osama like two feetsin one pair of mill-boots
    maybe they ,at this moment is playing black jack in the oval room

  2. The day will come when Edward Snowden will be on one of our postage stamps, and honored as the American hero that he is. It may take awhile yet, but it is inevitable that the American people will come to know the truth of his service to our country eventually. The truth cannot be hidden foreer.

  3. It goes without saying ….. that without 9/11 and Iraq, our latest era of mindless hysteria, careerism, profit-making, military adventurism, ………
    The problem with the obvious which is being completely ignored here is that a deep look at any and every specific part of the official 9/11 fairy tale reveals a narrative so deeply problematic, full of internal contradictions, leaps of logic, omissions of fact and outright deceptions.

    We don't know what really happened on 9/11 because all of the official investigations were not real investigations but rather exhibited all the hallmarks of an orchestrated coverup. From the 9/11 Commission which was run by Philip Zelikow who was the executive director, who was buddy buddy with Condoleeza Rice…..they coauthored a book together in the nineties, that's how close they were…to the NIST investigation into the collapse of three WTC towers on 9/11 which is being challenged directly by 2,350 architects and engineers who unlike NIST actually strictly adhere to the scientific method to dispute the nonsense found in both the NIST report on the towers in 2005 and WTC7 in 2008.

    Kevin Ryan who was fired by Underwriters Labs for questioning their work in support of NIST has done exhaustive investigative work into all the shady characters, careerists and war profiteers with strange, bizarre and endless conincidences and connections to the events of 9/11.

    Daniel Hopsicker has done astonishing research into the comings and goings of the "hijackers" down in Florida, revealing a multitude of facts that do do fit with the official story. David Ray Griffen has written nine books on 9/11 which demolish and argument that somehow the narrative presented in the 9/11 Commission Report could possibly be true.

    This mountain range of information is just ignored and swept under the rug as if it does not even exist by all these writers and analysts who so correctly point out that "It goes without saying … without 9/11 and Iraq, our latest era of mindless hysteria, careerism, profit-making, military adventurism"….yadda, yadda, yadda………..

    They can correctly argue that people like Cheney, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz are so evil as to start wars of aggression, torture, and otherwise set into motion the very agend they themselves laid out in the PNAC documents…..but when it come to even the suggestion that 9/11 was an inside job, they won't go there.

  4. > and so detached a president

    YEAH RIGHT. Hope & Change is anything but "detached". He is FULL IN. His entire sad career depends not on setting the goals and taking bold steps but on taking the path of least resistance and opportunism, covering in a mantle of populist glory if a can or in a mantle of fake contrition if he must. I can't remember a single word of truth I have ever heard from Mr. Obama. Not one.

  5. N?kdy lidé nev?dí, kdy cestovní ruch je nejjist?jší ?ešení, aby nám stát zdrav?jší. Mám nápad pro ty z vás, kte?í mohou být znud?ný s ?inností každodenního života, který je tím, že ?te ?lánky týkající opdage informací, cestovní, který jsem napsal a názvem nebo možná, pokud máte více si m?žete také poslechnout po p?edm?ty další atrakce, které jsem nazvané Doufám, že 2, co jsem dát prost?ednictvím t?chto p?ipomínek m?že dát kladnou hodnotu a stojí za to na vás všechno.

Comments are closed.