Reps. Gabbard and Jones Lead Bipartisan Resolution To End Presidential Wars

Washington, DC – Reps. Tulsi Gabbard (HI-02) and Walter Jones (NC-03) hosted a press conference today to introduce a bipartisan resolution reclaiming Congress’s constitutional right to declare war. H.Res. 922 would define presidential wars not declared by Congress as impeachable "high crimes and misdemeanors."

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard said: "For decades, Congress has ceded its Constitutional responsibility of deciding whether or not to declare war, to the President. As a result, we have found ourselves in a state of perpetual war, without a declaration of war by Congress and without input from the American people. Since 9/11 alone, our country has spent trillions of dollars on interventionist regime change wars, costing the lives of many Americans, taking a toll on our veterans, and causing people in our communities to struggle and suffer due to a lack of resources. Our bipartisan resolution aims to end presidential wars, and hold Congress accountable so it does its job in making the serious and costly decision about whether or not to send our nation’s sons and daughters to war."

"We are here today because Congress is not meeting its constitutional responsibility," said Congressman Jones. "If Congress does not debate sending your son or daughter to fight for this country, then we don’t need a Congress anyway. Nothing is more sacred or important than sending a man or woman to die for this country."

Bruce Fein, constitutional lawyer, said: "No war is worth fighting if the President is unable to convince a majority of House and Senate members to vote for a congressional declaration of war as required by Article I, section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution that Members of Congress are obligated, by oath or affirmation, to defend."

Michael Marceau, Veterans For Peace, President, DC Area Chapter, said: "Under the U.S. Constitution, it has been the duty of Congress to declare war if they deemed it necessary to do so. For more than half a century, our representatives have relinquished this very important job. This has resulted in many unnecessary military interventions all around the globe, causing untold millions of deaths and injuries, tens of millions of refugees, and destruction and environmental contamination of dozens of countries. It is time to reverse this course of action by having our members of Congress do the jobs they were elected to do. Veterans For Peace supports H.Res. 922 and urges Congress to take back its assigned responsibilities under the Constitution. We appreciate the efforts of Rep. Jones and Rep. Gabbard to introduce H.Res. 922 and urge all our members to contact their representatives to demand that they cosponsor this."

Paul Kawika Martin, Peace Action, Senior Director, Policy and Political Affairs, said: "It’s long past time to stop permanent presidential wars and for the Executive Branch to ask for congressional authorization and for Congress to vote on war as the constitution dictates.  That’s why Peace Action supports House Resolution 922, introduced by Representatives Walter B. Jones (NC-3) and Tulsi Gabbard (HI-2), that warns Presidents that circumventing the constitution and failing to get congressional approval for wars will be considered an impeachable offense."

On the House floor, Rep. Tulsi Gabbard said:

"Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution gives Congress the exclusive authority to declare war. But the last time Congress officially declared war was December 8th, 1941 – the day the US entered World War II. Ever since, Congress has failed to uphold their constitutional responsibility and have instead ceded power to the President. So, we remain in a state of perpetual war, led by presidents in both parties at great cost to the American people with no declaration of war by Congress and no input from the American people.

"The direct and indirect costs of these presidential wars are astounding. They take a toll on our troops, our veterans, and on the American people. Since 9/11 alone, we’ve spent trillions of dollars on regime-change wars and nation-building while people in our communities suffer and struggle because of a lack of resources here at home, what to mention the costs borne by our troops, those who pay the ultimate price, as well as those who come home with wounds that are visible and invisible. The American people deserve accountability. Mr. Walter Jones and I have introduced a bipartisan resolution 922 to make sure that Congress fulfills its constitutional role, ends presidential wars, and has robust debate before making the decision to send our troops into battle."

Background:H.Res 922 would reclaim Congress’s constitutional right to declare war by:

  • Defining presidential wars not declared by Congress under Article I, section 8, clause 11 (Declare War Clause) as impeachable "high crimes and misdemeanors"
  • Prohibiting the President from perpetuating ongoing wars or supplying war materials, military troops, trainers, or advisers, military intelligence, financial support or their equivalent in association, cooperation, assistance, or common cause without first receiving congressional authorization

Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard is a leading voice for peace in Congress, advocating against counterproductive, regime-change wars. Most recently, she joined a bipartisan coalition of 88 Members of Congress urging President Trump to consult and receive authorization from Congress prior to ordering the use of US military force against Syria. She has also advocated for ending the regime change war in Syria and condemned US support of Saudi Arabia in the Yemen civil war.

Follow Rep. Tulsi Gabbard on social media:

Media Contact:
Emily Latimer, (202) 604-2330

23 thoughts on “Reps. Gabbard and Jones Lead Bipartisan Resolution To End Presidential Wars”

  1. Tulsi Gabbard would be a democrat to root for in the 2020 primaries. Too bad she’s so far left.

      1. I know she’s not going to win; she’s way too anti war for that anyway. It would just be fun to root for her in the primaries against all those warmongerers. I assume she would make the debate stage.

      1. Too far left in an economic sense. She supports single payer healthcare, for example. I agree she doesn’t go far enough as far as non interventionism goes, but shes better than any other Dems.

        1. RG, Too far left in an economic sense? Given the gutting of our economy and quality of life by parasitic banksters and by the fact that the number one cause of bankruptcy here are piratical medical and pharmaceutical fees, it would seem to be time for genuine economic reform and the prosecution of thieves.

          1. It’s also due to capitalists who actively try to destroy organized labor and drive down wages in order to skim off the top of everyone else’s skill set and or blood, sweat and tears.

        2. I hear you. I think health care is a fundamental human right but the federal government is the last group of number-crunching thugs I would entrust it too. I prefer autonomous collectives, which is about as left as it gets but it would actually require more deregulation to work. Too many people on the left in this country have their priorities out of wack. Single payer sounds lovely but it does nothing to empower the poor.

          1. Wait, the answer to neoliberalism is more neoliberalism ? Government is benign in and of itself. The profit motive is what corrupts governments and society.

          2. Class corrupts. Government is just another class of people who can do things proles like me and you can’t. Big government is just another word for big business which is just another word for the state. True leftists reject the state. We can do better than begging for scraps.

      2. She doesn’t neatly fit into either party. That’s what I like about her. We need more not-strictly partisan free thinkers in both houses of Congress and in both parties.

  2. They are right by the Constitution. But do you really think this bought-and-paid-for Congress, so anxious for war with Russia, would ever vote to oppose it? It would not surprise me if this vermin (excluding heroes like Gabbard, Jones, and Paul, for example) would vote to declare war on Russia over the objections of the President.

    1. The viscous circle of campaign finance and the corruption of the lobby due to a corporate uniparty bought and paid for by capitalist rent seekers whose only contribution to society is political and legal corruption in order to legalize fraud and exploitation.

      1. I think you mean vicious, but viscous also works. An unhealthy, repulsive sludge. That’s the corruption eating everything up. It seems to me that there is an obvious solution, mentioned in Bulworth, that as in Canada, broadcasters are required to provide a certain quantity of time for political speechifying. That lets them get the message out. Then you don’t let them run ads, which are so expensive that of course the politicians have to look for well-heeled contributors, who naturally need payback.

  3. I have been aware of and following Tulsi Gabbard for a couple of years now and I think that she has all the chops, presence, assets you could ask for in a President, in the sense that the President is the lead singer in the band called the American government and is basically the face of the state. I hope her fan base is growing and the DNC isn’t so completely up its own nethers to see that she represents a credible way forward.

  4. Why isn’t Justin Amash a cosponsor of this bill? I’d love to see him in a presidential race.

Comments are closed.