No US-Israel Defense Pact!

One of the most harebrained ideas to come down the pike in recent years is the proposed U.S.-Israel defense pact. The Jerusalem Post reports that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo “made progress” on finalizing the pact while meeting in Lisbon recently.

This is an idea that has absolutely nothing to recommend it. At a time when the US government should be ending its “collective defense arrangements” – NATO and the other six – such an arrangement with Israel is an especially bad idea. But it would be just as bad were it the only such arrangement the US government had.

Imagine the American state being formally obliged to defend Israel no matter what. (It’s clear the US government has been informally, politically obliged since 1967, but Israeli officials have not wanted US forces in the country. Israel receives $3.8 billion a year in military assistance, an investment that US officials would not leave unattended if it were jeopardized.) This would be outrageous even if Israel confined its military actions purely to self-defense – the government should not pledge American lives to another country’s defense. But in fact, Israel is one of the most aggressive nations on earth. Over the decades it has initiated wars against neighboring countries, not to mention against the Palestinians, most recently in the Gaza Strip. Israel portrays itself as threatened existentially by Iran, but in truth, Israel has been threatening and acting against Iran for a couple of decades. Israel’s ally in the covert, cyber, and proxy-terrorist warfare has been the US government. Iran has no nuclear weapons, but Israel does.

Not everyone in Israel wants a formal defense pact for fear that it would tie the Israeli government’s hands. Netanyahu’s political rival Benny Gantz and former security officials think this, but not everyone in Israel agrees. Some also see the proposed alliance as Netanyahu’s cynical way to assure he is returned to power – facing trial on corruption charges, he has failed to form a new government, despite two recent elections. Pompeo, who apparently wants to run for the Senate, may also be acting in his own political interest.

At any rate, the American people should resoundingly let the politicians know that the proposed collective defense arrangement with Israel should be scrapped.

No blood for Israel!

Sheldon Richman is the executive editor of The Libertarian Institute, senior fellow and chair of the trustees of the Center for a Stateless Society, and a contributing editor at Antiwar.com. He is the former senior editor at the Cato Institute and Institute for Humane Studies, former editor of The Freeman, published by the Foundation for Economic Education, and former vice president at the Future of Freedom Foundation. His latest book is Coming to Palestine.

26 thoughts on “No US-Israel Defense Pact!”

  1. No, no, no, HELL NO! That bunch of bellicose bastards will have every US born child pushing up daisies in the Sinai. If they start a war, let them fight it. If somebody else starts a war, we have a Congress!

  2. Israel is a sure way to get America into endless wars on its behalf. Israel’s belligerence would increase tenfold.

    1. The US government is already fighting endless wars on (eg Iraq, Iranian economic sanctions, Syria) Israel’s behalf.

      These war crimes committed by the US government on behalf of Israel benefit this nation (ie US) nor it’s citizens one iota. They have however cost us tremendously in terms of lives sacrificed, money squandered and liberties lost.

      Demand accountability.

      Demand American sons/daughters be brought home now – alive not in a casket.

  3. the failed terrorist state of israel should be shuttered and the land given back to the people it actually belongs to, the Palestinians..
    real countries don’t BEG FOR MONEY from every country that has two coins to rub together and then have the audacity to pretend to be successful!
    israel, get out of mommy’s basement and stop being the homicidal problem child of the middle east!

    1. definitely and his latest stunt”executive order” in violation of the constitution seals it. impeach the traitor and imprison him at gitmo.

      1. Pence would be even more pro-Israel. Trump at least wants out of Afghanistan, finally.

        I do appreciate that you’re mad at Trump for the right reasons, not for the silly reasons given by the MSM and Dems.

        1. rump has no such intention of getting out of afghanistan. its pandering gone wild. as for sicx pence, he has no chance at being remotely liked.

          1. She’s not as pro as most. She’s possibly a Hindu nationalist, which is better than most, unless Pakistan and India enter a war.

          2. Obama and Trump was/is better than McCain/Clinton. Even Trump’s Zionist executive order could create a positive reaction.

            The weird support for Latin fascism will eventually create a counter reaction in favour of socialism there, which is one reason I wish the US would stay out of Latin politics. My point is just that the reactions are often most important.

            I don’t think I’ll know whether Trump has been positive or negative until he’s out of office.

  4. just who does isn’treal need defense from? no one. if the psychopathic paranoid leaders of isn’treal tried getting along with the neighbors the world would be better off.

  5. “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize” i attributed to Strom,

Comments are closed.