Battle of the Atlantic: Citing Nazi Germany as Model, US Military Chief Hails New NATO Command

General Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was in Norfolk, Virginia on July 15 to mark the second NATO command in America achieving full operational capability. NATO’s Joint Force Command – Norfolk (JFC-Norfolk) joined NATO’s Allied Command Transformation (ACT) in the same city as the only NATO commands outside Europe.

ACT, whose website is titled Allied Command Transformation: NATO’s Warfare Development Command, was inaugurated in 2003.

The new command was initially launched shortly after NATO’s Joint Support and Enabling Command was in Ulm, Germany in late 2019. Both commands at that time achieved initial operational capability (or initial operating capability). Joint Force Command – Norfolk is designed to expedite the deployment of troops and armor across the Atlantic; Joint Support and Enabling Command’s mission is to “speed up, coordinate and safeguard the movement of allied armor and infantry across European borders.” The two are thus integrally connected.

Their joint purpose is to move military personnel and equipment from the U.S. across the Atlantic Ocean, then from European ports across the continent to the Russian border. The recent DEFENDER Europe-21, the largest since the Cold War with 31,000 troops from 27 nations, activated the new system to expedite the transit of large military, including armored, units from the US to the Russian border.

On July 15 General Milley addressed what the Defense Department described as assembled dignitaries on board the USS Kearsarge amphibious assault ship and was accompanied by the new Joint Force Command – Norfolk commander Vice Admiral Andrew Lewis. Lewis is also the commander of the US Second Fleet. As with other NATO commands, its commander is simultaneously in charge of a US command as well, as with US European Command/Supreme Allied Commander Europe, US Navy Sixth Fleet/Naval Striking and Support Forces NATO and US Air Forces in Europe – Air Forces Africa/NATO’s Allied Air Command.

As the Pentagon story on the event states at the beginning and without equivocation, “If deterrence fails, the mission of the command is to fight and win the Battle of the Atlantic.”

In language that evokes the epochal if not the apocalyptic, Milley said: “In my view, the world is entering a period of potential instability as some nations…and clearly terrorist groups and perhaps some rogue actors, are seeking to undermine and challenge the existing international order. They seek to weaken the system of cooperation and collective security that has been in existence for some time. The dynamic nature of today’s current environment is counterbalanced by an order that was put in place 76 years ago, at the end of World War II.”

The activities of terrorist groups are hardly capable of upsetting the entire post-World War II global order. The nations he alluded to are Russia and China. They can be no others. Every American unified combatant command has recently identified those two nations as the main focus of the Pentagon’s attention, in every part of the world, with Iran and North Korea branded second-tier regional threats.

He further frightened his listeners with the figure of 150 million lives lost between 1914 and 1945, that is from the beginning of World War I to the end of World War II, then issued this brutal assessment: “That is the butcher’s bill of great power war. That’s what this international order that’s been in existence for seven and a half decades, is designed to prevent. That’s what JFC-Norfolk is all about. It’s to prevent that outcome.”

No modesty there; no sense of perspective or proportion; no subtlety, nuance or intricacy; surely no attempt at statesmanship. Accept NATO’s role in dominating the international military and security realm or horrors unimaginable will be unleashed on humanity. But at the bottom of that Pandora’s box there isn’t hope.

He further stated that the creation of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in 1949 was the “brainchild” of the Western leaders who waged and won World War II and established the postwar order. He intoned: “Without question, NATO has been the most successful military alliance in human history. And NATO is still very much a vital and critical part of our regional security framework, and indeed, our global security framework. In fact, in my view, it’s the linchpin that holds together the period of great power peace that we are now enjoying.”

Without NATO, he communicated, the world would have been plunged into another Second World War, magnified by nuclear devastation. And now the international order, recently rechristened the rules-based international order, is under attack.

Another factor that is of grave concern is the change in the character of war, the general said. Milley defined that bedrock of warfighting as “how we fight, the organizations we fight with and the technologies that we use.” The last time such a qualitative transformation in warmaking capabilities occurred was between the two world wars with the introduction (in World War I) and improvement of aviation, tanks and other armored vehicles, new naval technologies and other technological advancements – “radio, radar and more ” – to integrate the above.

He then elaborated further by stating that although the former belligerents in the First World War all possessed the same technology, only one – Germany – successfully developed, integrated and applied technological innovations: “Germany, combined those technologies, and the German way of war, and combine them to organizations and leader development in such a way that Nazi Germany was able to overrun Western Europe in 18 months. Other countries combined it in different ways. And they didn’t have success.”

That clearly appears to be citing the German model of the Third Reich as an exemplary one to be emulated. To leave no doubt, he added: “And I would tell you that the same thing is happening right this minute. There’s a whole set of technologies that are driving fundamental change.”

Notwithstanding his liberal use of the word peace in his address – as in armies with their weapons developed to kill people and destroy property and soldiers trained to kill only exist to bring peace to the world – he belied his own duplicity in the following statement:

“I would argue that the country that masters those technologies, combines them with their doctrine, develops their leadership to take maximum advantage of them, is likely going to have significant and perhaps even decisive advantage at the beginning of the next war.

If more naked and brazen threats have been made in modern times by the top military commander of a major nation – and of the world’s military superpower at that – they’re unfamiliar to this writer.

Milley’s peroration included touting NATO as the most powerful military alliance in the world (his precise words) and the US as wielder of “the most powerful and capable military in the world,” and ended with this hardly-disguised throwing down of the gauntlet to Russia, China and the world:

“We have to maintain the readiness of the present, we have to modernize for the future. We are ready right now. Those who think we are not are mistaken. And any adversary that seeks to challenge the United States military resolve will do well to respect this military, and our alliances and NATO.”

With that language, why not dispense altogether with diplomacy, with the State Department, with embassies, with the United Nations, with international law? The world is a jungle and the savage with the most lethal, the most technologically-sophisticated weapons dominates it. That is the message and no other.

Rick Rozoff has been involved in anti-war and anti-interventionist work in various capacities for forty years. He lives in Chicago, Illinois. He is the manager of Stop NATO. This originally appeared at Anti-Bellum.

12 thoughts on “Battle of the Atlantic: Citing Nazi Germany as Model, US Military Chief Hails New NATO Command”

  1. In one moment Milley is painted a hero for opposing the Trump coup, in another he is painted as an admirer of the Reich.
    Who is the real Milley?

    1. Who is the real Milley?

      A desk jockey who never heard a shot fired in anger and the Army’s highest ranking sycophant.

      No wonder we don’t win wars anymore.

      1. Whatever else he may be, he’s not “a desk jockey who never heard a shot fired in anger.” He commanded armor platoons and infantry companies and brigades, saw action in Panama, Iraq, and Afghanistan, and wears the Combat Infantryman Badge, 2nd Award, among his ribbons.

        1. I don’t know what rank he was when he was in command in those places you mentioned, but being in command of something when you are an Lt., or Capt., as compared to when you are a Colonel, or General, means the “action” you see will have a pretty wide range as to the amount of danger involved. Plus your MOS factors in. Don’t get me wrong, I’d wet myself in any of the situations, I was just saying.

    2. Who is the real Milley?

      I found Milley’s speech on youtube with a dreadful AI-generated caption. What I saw was a fellow at least as AntiWar as anyone here.

      That clearly appears to be citing the German model of the Third Reich as an exemplary one to be emulated.

      Author Rozoff completely misunderstood what Milley said about Germany’s combination of the Technologies of the day. After the early defeats, the Allies first copied, then improved the “German model” of the Wehrmacht. NOT the Third Reich government.

      For example, the plodding Soviet army got more than 400,000 US trucks under Lend Lease which vastly improved its mobility. On all fronts, no longer would the German army encounter enemy troops without decent anti-tank guns. The German air force was now fighting outnumbered against swarms of fighters every bit as good as their own.

      The speech in question was basically a rah-rah affair, and I think Milley would be hard pressed to defend NATO’s change from a Defensive Alliance to an Aggressive one. Overall though, I’d grade it as a solid “B” – mostly for his demonstrated loathing of the massive dying which comes with large wars.

  2. Yet another senior Navy command created to employ more Admirals. The Navy has now created three new fleet commands the past four years, even as the size of the fleet declined. Milley made no mention of the disastrous beginning of the Battle of the Atlantic that spilled into the Gulf of Mexico. This was kept secret for years.

  3. Jun 23, 2021 Gen. Mark Milley defends teaching ‘critical race theory’ at West Point | New York Post

    During a budget hearing held by the House Armed Services Committee, Army Gen. Mark Milley, chairman of the Pentagon’s Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that “on the issue of critical race theory, etc., a lot of us have to get much smarter on whatever the theory is.”

  4. NATO is an outdated and archaic relic of the Cold War, which forces US taxpayers to foot the bill for other country’s defenses.

    More importantly, we provide most of the heavy lifting for NATO’s military engagements, which means our sons and daughters bear a disproportional amount of its war related tragedies.

  5. The nations he alluded to are Russia and China.

    That is double talk. Once I know history, the part that cannot be changed America supported Communism from its birth. I quote an article from “The American Heritage”

    The Tribune was not only Marx’s meal ticket but his experimental outlet for agitation and ideas during the most creative period of his life. Had there been no Tribune sustaining him, there might possibly— who knows?—have been no Das Kapital. And had there been no Das Kapital, would there have been a Lenin and a Stalin as the master’s disciples? And without a Marxist Lenin and Stalin, in turn, would there have been…?

    [When Karl Marx Worked For Horace Greeley-American Heritage]
    That’s the beginning when the father of Communism gets a break from America. The political journey of Communism where the “Communist Manifesto” was first published in London in 1848 and the American publication was in 1872.

    -The 1917 Russian Communist revolution had funding from American millionaires that included the Rockefellers, Warburg, Melon. Because Communism succeeded in Russia its agents fully supported it in China’s 1949 revolution. China wouldn’t be the manufacturing center of the planet if not for Corporate America’s herculean sacrifice of American labor through outsourcing

  6. NATO is just one more Tool for the USA for meddling in other Countries affairs and Help in Americas War in every corner of this Planet !!

Comments are closed.