Human rights groups were cautiously optimistic Thursday as the United States military – which has killed more civilians in foreign wars than any other armed force on Earth in the post-World War II era – published a plan meant to reduce non-combatant casualties.
Declaring that “the protection of civilians is a strategic priority as well as a moral imperative,” the Pentagon’s 46-page Civilian Harm Mitigation and Response Action Plan (CHMR-AP) lays out a series of policy steps aimed at preventing and responding to the death and injury of non-combatants.
These steps include establishing a civilian protection center of excellence, improving commanders’ understanding of civilian environments, developing standardized incident reporting and data management processes, and improving the military’s ability to assess and respond when noncombatants are harmed by US attacks.
“Today’s announcement marks a promising first step for the Department of Defense to adequately address and prevent future civilian harm caused by US military operations,” Daphne Eviatar, Amnesty International USA’s Security with Human Rights program director, said in a statement. “However, how and when the military implements these new policies will be critical.”
“The US also needs to acknowledge and address the many previous cases of civilian harm that have so far been denied or ignored,” she added. “Amnesty has extensively reported on the impacts of US military operations on civilians around the world, and will continue to monitor those impacts while we make recommendations to the Department of Defense to help ensure that human rights are not violated in the name of national security.”
While there's still a lot more for the US to do on civilian harm, especially as it relates to the people it's killed and maimed in the past, this is a HUGE step.
Sending so much love to all the people who worked nonstop to make this a reality. https://t.co/RDw3XAAjhg
— Allegra Harpootlian (@ally_harp) August 25, 2022
The U.K.-based airstrike monitor group Airwars – which along with partners last month published recommendations for the Pentagon plan – called the document “a significant step for transparency.”
Annie Shiel, a senior adviser for the Center for Civilians in Conflict (CIVIC) responded to the CHMR-AP’s release with a statement commending the Pentagon for the “unprecedented” plan.
“If implemented effectively, the CHMR-AP offers opportunities to address long-standing structural flaws in US policy and practice, prevent future harm, and provide civilians harmed by US operations with the recognition and response they deserve,” she wrote. “The hard work begins now, with implementation, and the true measure of this effort will be how it delivers real results for civilians.”
Writing for Just Security Thursday, Shiel urged members of Congress to “include important proposals to better prevent and respond to civilian harm caused by US military operations abroad” in the Fiscal Year 2023 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which lawmakers will take up in the coming weeks.
“Successfully reckoning with past civilian harm and overhauling US policies for preventing and responding to harm will require sustained engagement not only from the Department of Defense and the White House, but also from Congress,” she asserted.
Still, the plan appears to take a "look forward, not backward" approach to past instances of civilian harm. These civilians deserve recognition of what they have suffered and genuine accountability.
— Rosie Berman (@RosieBerman) August 25, 2022
Listing a series of policy recommendations similar to those detailed in the CHMR-AP, Shiel added that such provisions “would fill critical gaps in Defense Department policy, strengthen and resource [US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin’s] vision for reform, and ensure necessary oversight over the too-often devastating human impacts of the United States’ use of force abroad. Congress should ensure that these provisions are reflected in the final law.”
While it is impossible to say with certainty how many civilians have been killed or wounded by US bombs and bullets during the course of the ongoing 21-year so-called War on Terror, expert estimates range from several hundred thousand to well over one million.
Airwars credits US President Joe Biden with killing fewer civilians during his first year in office than any of his three 21st-century predecessors. The group said that during Biden’s first 12 months, between 10 and 26 noncombatants were killed in 58 attacks in Iraq and Syria, 50 civilians died in 372 strikes in Afghanistan, and six people perished in an unknown number of bombardments in Yemen.
Biden has, however, been accused of following his predecessors’ pattern of undercounting the number of civilians harmed by US attacks. Furthermore, high-profile incidents like the August 2021 drone strike which killed 10 Afghan relatives – including seven children – in the closing days of the US invasion of Afghanistan have reinforced peace activists’ insistence that the only way to avoid harming civilians is to avoid waging war in the first place.
Brett Wilkins is is staff writer for Common Dreams. Based in San Francisco, his work covers issues of social justice, human rights and war and peace. This originally appeared at CommonDreams and is reprinted with the author’s permission.
7 thoughts on “Groups Cautiously Welcome Pentagon’s New Civilian Casualty Action Plan”
I will not be holding my breath!
Nov 9, 2016 Costs of War: the Human Toll of the Post-9/11 Wars By Brown University
The Costs of War Project at Brown University’s Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs illustrates the human toll of the post-9/11 wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan.
May 16, 2014 90% of All Deaths In War Are Civilians
And we did all that for oil?
We must bomb them and murder them to get them to sell their oil? Otherwise, they would hoard their oil and remain poor?
Not so much about oil as much as it is all about power for the Pentagon Joint Chiefs!
Aug 19, 2022 What is imperialism? Exploring theories of hegemony (with historian Aaron Good)
A discussion of different theoretical concepts of imperialism and hegemony and how they relate to the United States empire.
So we’ve been occupying the Middle East since 1990 because of the chiefs?
The CIA drug trade to be exact this is the way the CIA funds it’s off the books operations. There is zero chance the Joint Chiefs do not know this Lord Dude.
September 4, 2010 The Imperial Anatomy of Al-Qaeda. The CIA’s Drug-Running Terrorists and the “Arc of Crisis”
Part 1 examines the origins of the intelligence network known as the Safari Club, which financed and organized an international conglomerate of terrorists, the CIA’s role in the global drug trade, the emergence of the Taliban and the origins of al-Qaeda.
Oh boy! Our senseless wars killing less civilians! Geez, isn’t that wonderful? I guess if we can never stop them, we can at least limit how many “innocents” get killed. For some reason I don’t feel thrilled.
Comments are closed.