Escalation in Iran Would Be Madness

The people urging the U.S. to escalate are fanatics and ideologues who just want to see Iran in ruins no matter what it takes.

by | May 18, 2026 | News | 0 comments

Seth Cropsey makes another deranged appeal for escalation against Iran:

Mr. Trump’s objective shouldn’t be to bluff the Iranians out. Instead it should be to demonstrate that if push comes to shove, the U.S. will commit to an overwhelming confrontation that breaks the Iranian state economically and politically. An air campaign approximating the war’s first week, which disoriented Iranian capabilities, is possible now that the dust has settled around Iran’s leadership.

Defeating Iran is paramount. On a successful outcome rests the credibility of American deterrence, the safety of international sea lanes, a return to the normalcy of global energy markets, and the regional stability that is key to all these goods. The president should finish what he rightly started.

Further escalation will be costly, and it is unlikely to deliver the defeat that hawks desperately want. Iran has demonstrated that it can and will retaliate in kind, so more attacks on its civilian infrastructure will provoke new waves of attacks on the Gulf states and Israel. According to recent reports, Iran retains far more of its missiles and missile launchers than the administration initially claimed, so they do not lack the means to carry out reprisals.

The U.S. and Israel have shown that they can cause plenty of death and destruction, but they have been remarkably unsuccessful in making any lasting gains. A new round of bombing will likely be no more successful in forcing Iran to yield. Escalation will simply intensify the conflict to no one’s benefit.

The president recklessly launched a criminal war for no reason, and he lost. Persisting in this disastrous course would be madness. Defeating Iran isn’t worth the enormous costs that would be required. The U.S. does not need to defeat Iran. There is a much quicker, cheaper path to restoring normalcy and stability, and that is by lifting the blockade and ending the war.

In case it wasn’t obvious, Iran hawks don’t want a return to normalcy and stability. They can’t stand the idea that Iran might emerge intact from the war they have been seeking for decades. They wish to see Iran thrown into chaos and bloodshed, and they don’t care how many Iranians, Americans, and others pay the price.

Read the rest of the article at Eunomia

Daniel Larison is a contributing editor for Antiwar.com and maintains his own site at Eunomia. He is former senior editor at The American Conservative. He has been published in the New York Times Book Review, Dallas Morning News, World Politics Review, Politico Magazine, Orthodox Life, Front Porch Republic, The American Scene, and Culture11, and was a columnist for The Week. He holds a PhD in history from the University of Chicago, and resides in Lancaster, PA. Follow him on Twitter.

Join the Discussion!

We welcome thoughtful and respectful comments. Hateful language, illegal content, or attacks against Antiwar.com will be removed.

For more details, please see our Comment Policy.