Official Truth in a nutshell

I wrote “Smokescreen” in the early hours of July 13, so I could not have read, much less mentioned, an editorial that appeared later that morning in Newsday. Titled “Serbs finally look within,” the editorial manages to pull together just about every strand of Official Truth about Srebrenica, and can thus serve as an exemplar of mainstream opinion. It is somehow fitting that such an” honor” belongs to a paper that peddled the Pulitzer-winning atrocity propaganda of Roy Gutman, early in the Bosnian War. Continue reading “Official Truth in a nutshell”

Kosovo and Iraq

Many don’t see the parallels: each was (is) a failed foreign policy. Few politicians, liberals, “conservatives” or pundits supported or opposed both. Except of course, Antiwar.com. Here are some choice quotes from many who were critical of the US intervention in Kosovo. My favorite:

Victory means exit strategy, and it’s important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is.

~ George W. Bush, 1999 on the intervention in Kosovo

hatip Catallarchy.

Re: A Balkans Connection?

As Justin said, the possiblity has indeed been raised that the explosives used in the London came from the Balkans; the first rumor was that explosives were Serbian, but just as the accusations in the run-up to the Iraq invasion that Serbs “supplied Saddam”, this proved to be spurious.

According to one retired colonel of the Yugoslav army, the explosives used in London could have come from a factory in northern Montenegro – but these have been in possession of all sides in the 1991-95 wars, and some have even reached the KLA terrorists in Kosovo and Macedonia. One of the persons under investigation by the Brits lived with the mujahedin in northern Bosnia, who certainly had access to these explosives.

However, now that the London bombings cannot be pinned on Serbs, trust the legacy media to completely bury the Bosnian/Kosovo angle, and never so much as mention the possibility that Bosnian Muslims were anything but pure, innocent victims of evil Serb aggression. Certainly, claims that the ruling Muslim party has numerous connections with Islamic extremist groups and governments will either never be raised, or will be dismissed out of hand.

The London Bombers: A Balkan Connection?

Four of the London bombers have been identified: they are Hasib Hussein, 19, Shehzad Tanweer, 22, “Rashid Facha, a British-born Pakistani in his twenties; and Jacksey Fiaz, about 35.”

Juan Cole tosses us this interesting lead from Al-Sharq al-Awsat:

“There are reports that the 4 bombers received al-Qaeda-type commando training, and that another 100 persons have been put under surveillance. Via the Times of London it says that the explosive used were “military” and may have come from the Balkans. [The bomb-maker may have run the cell and may be at large.]”

A Balkan connection, eh? Why am I not surprised?

Novak Spills the Beans

To all the partisan Democrats who are screaming “Why didn’t they prosecute Bob Novak while poor little Judy Miller sleeps on a mattress in jail?” — well, here’s your answer:

“Columnist Robert Novak provided detailed accounts to federal prosecutors of his conversations with Bush administration officials who were sources for his controversial July 11, 2003 column identifying Valerie Plame as a clandestine CIA officer, according to attorneys familiar with the matter.”

Hat tip: Laura Rozen

Are you happy now? I didn’t think so …

For my own take on the Novak-Plame imbroglio, go here. A snippet:

“Let’s get one thing clear: Novak committed no crime. He merely reported one. The criminals are the “senior administration officials” who whispered secrets in his ear with the knowledge that they would almost certainly see print. To all those supposedly “antiwar” Republican-haters, who write Novak off as a shill for the Bush administration: without Novak’s reporting, the machinations of the neocons would still be taking place in the dark. His column shone the spotlight on their intrigues, and in no way did he denigrate or dismiss Joe Wilson. As Jack Shafer put it in Slate:

“‘Whatever the leakers’ objective, Novak did not serve them very well. I defy anyone to read Novak’s now-famous column and summarize it coherently. The brief discussion of Plame and her shadowy occupation seems gratuitous in the larger frame of the article, which, if anything, sympathizes with Wilson’s view that the case for war wasn’t properly made.”

Robert Kuttner gets it right.

Fuzzy Math and “Genocide”

I should have noted this Monday, when I first read the article, but was so overwhelmed by the sheer volume of articles about Srebrenica – the vast majority repeating exactly the same tired propaganda – that I haven’t got around to it. But this article, in the London Sunday Times, was somewhat different – not just because it admitted there was a history of massacres on both sides in Srebrenica, or that Serbs and Muslims in the area still very much hate each other, or even that most of the dead came from a military column, and were therefore not “civilians.” What caught my eye was the “factoid” at the end, “How a safe haven turned into hell.” Look carefully at the numbers. Continue reading “Fuzzy Math and “Genocide””