Urgent: Congress Voting on Pro-War Iran Resolution Today

From Jamal Abdi, Policy Director, National Iranian American Council

Congress is planning to vote today to make war with Iran more likely.

This afternoon, the House of Representatives is going to consider H.Res.568 – a resolution that significantly lowers the threshold for war with Iran.

It is no coincidence that this vote is taking place just a week before the U.S. and Iran resume negotiations that many in the pro-war camp want to sabotage.

We need your help today to stop this push for war.

Please take a moment to call to your Member of Congress to tell him or her to vote NO on H.Res.568 and to demand language stating that there is no authorization for war with Iran.

Your Representative needs to hear from you and others who oppose war with Iran before they take this vote.

Please call 1-855-68 NO WAR (1-855-686-6927) to contact your Member of Congress and tell them to stand up against the push for war.

Here is a quick script you can use:

• My name is _______ and I’m calling from [your city]. I’d like to talk to your foreign policy advisor. (Ask to leave a message if they are not available.)

• I am very concerned about the prospect of another war in the Middle East with Iran. I’m asking that you oppose House Resolution 568, because it aims to block diplomacy and make war with Iran inevitable. I ask that you vote no on this resolution when it comes up for a vote today and to demand language stating that there is no authorization for war with Iran. Please have the courage to speak out publicly against the push for war and in support of a diplomatic resolution to resolve the nuclear standoff and other critical issues like human rights in Iran.

• Thank you.

We also have full talking points that you can use below. You can also use your zip code to find your Member of Congress here.

Why Is This Resolution Dangerous?

1. H.Res.568 significantly lowers the threshold for going to war. This resolution effectively calls for a military attack on Iran when Iran when it obtains a “nuclear weapons capability” – an undefined term that, by some interpretations, could already apply to Iran, not to mention Brazil, Japan, the Netherlands, and any country with a civilian nuclear program. We should not stake questions of war and peace on such shaky foundations.

2. H.Res.568 sets conditions for going to war without stating that it is not an authorization for using military force. Given the resolution’s unambiguous statement ruling out containing a nuclear-capable Iran, this resolution could be construed by this President or a future President as an authorization of force for launching military action against Iran that would have devastating consequences. At the absolute minimum, the resolution should clarify that it is not an authorization of force, and does not provide a legal authority for the President to initiate war against Iran.

3. H.Res.568 dangerously confuses U.S. policy. While supporters of the resolution have repeatedly claimed, “President Obama has stated that it’s unacceptable for Iran to obtain a nuclear capability,” this is not true. President Obama has never used the “nuclear capability” phrasing, speaking instead of Iran “getting,” “obtaining” or “acquiring” a nuclear weapon as the U.S. red line. The presence of international nuclear inspectors in Iran and U.S. intelligence gathering operations make it nearly impossible for Iran to build a nuclear weapon undetected. U.S. and Israeli intelligence has been clear: Iran has yet to decide whether to actually build a bomb—our aim must be to use diplomacy to implement the verification measures to guarantee Iran cannot take this step.

4. H.Res.568 undermines diplomacy and takes peaceful options off the table. The U.S. and Iran are scheduled to hold negotiations on May 23, along with the rest of the P5+1 (Permanent 5 Security Council members plus Germany). These talks hold the potential to achieve real progress in curbing Iran’s nuclear program—with Iran’s Supreme Leader for the first time publicly endorsing negotiations and signaling that Iran is prepared to make key concessions to cap its enrichment in accordance with U.S. national security interests. This hawkish bill could undermine those talks by signaling to Iran that the U.S. is committed to war. Diplomacy is the only way to prevent war, prevent an Iranian nuclear weapon, and put mechanisms in place to effectively address human rights abuses in Iran and create space. Congress should support diplomacy, not undermine it.

Officials warn against H.Res.568

Senator Dianne Feinstein warned this resolution would interfere with current diplomatic efforts with Iran: “I really believe that these negotiations should proceed without any resolutions from us right now….This is a very sensitive time. Candidly, I think diplomacy should have an opportunity to work without getting involved in political discussions about a resolution.”

Colin Kahl, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for the Middle East cautioned: “I think that all of us in this town need to be very careful of taking positions, whether its up on the Hill or out there, that box in our negotiators from being able to find a diplomatic solution….That’s what concerns me about the resolution.

Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, former Chief of Staff for Secretary of State Colin Powell, warns: “This resolution reads like the same sheet of music that got us into the Iraq war, and could be the precursor for a war with Iran….it’s effectively a thinly-disguised effort to bless war.”

One thought on “Urgent: Congress Voting on Pro-War Iran Resolution Today”

  1. Writing or calling Congressional "representatives" is a placebo meant to pacify and placate the peasants. It accomplishes nothing.

    1. What would you suggest people do instead? Is it better to fight a losing fight than to just give in and let all heck break loose?

      I do sometimes think it's meant to entirely demoralize people, to have to call congress on a weekly basis at this point just for the civil liberties, police state and war matters alone. So as a busy person you make it your job (in addition to you know your your real job) to call congress people on the BS every stupid week, meanwhile they make making BS policies their career and it's coming at us almost faster than we can keep up at this point.

      1. "…What would you suggest people do instead?…"

        Ha, that's easy…vote the SOBs back to jobs they had before they decided to suck at the Federal tit and force their ideological scat down our throats thinking they know what is best for everyone else. If they won't listen to the people who the supposedly "represent" then throw them out of office. They need to understand they are no different than the rest of us and when they forget that, slap the beeches down.

        1. "force their ideological scat down our throats thinking they know what is best for everyone else."

          Nice turn of phrase curmudgeonvt …….. You should be on the elect Ron Paul bandwagon or some other wider venue………….

  2. Without realising it, pro-war leaders are digging their own political grave. When this war starts and all hell breaks loose, there will be real economic consequences for ordinary Americans and businesses. American politicians have adopted a self defeating strategy by opening up more fronts than they can handle. The pain this war is going to cause, if it cannot be prevented, will be on an uprecedented scale but the happy end is that the birth pangs of destruction and economic ruin will give birth to a new and better political dispensation.

      1. Judging by the extraordinarily brainless comments I see posted on places like Yahoo! News I can assure you the average American just doesn't get it. They are either a) so off the mark I have to wonder if they even read the story they're commenting on, or b) no matter what the story is, it's always the fault of 'those dirty Muzzies' and/or 'anti-Semites' and/or 'those lying Iranians'- even when the story is on an issue in the American economy.

        Joe Sixpack and Suzy Boxwine can't see past DWTS and the Kardashian girls to know what's going on in the world or even their own country.

  3. Time to grab some pitchforks and light some torches. Washington isn't going to listen to anything until it's forced to. Threatening Congressmen with their jobs does nothing- one term and they're set for life. Waterboarding, on the other hand, might get some results- you know, since it's not torture and it's so effective in getting the correct answers and all.

  4. "Contacting your Congressperson" – is a pathetic joke. The last time, I called my Senator's office on Capitol Hill to register my feelings, my phone call was answered by an "intern". This "intern" was supposedly working for free to "get experience in government". When I spoke out against some piece of anti-American/pro-israeli legislative junk that was pending, this "intern" started to argue with me. He defended the honor of Israel and dismissed the Palestinians as "all terrorists". You can imagine how he relayed my message to my Senator. The "intern" was probably on the payroll of AIPAC or other group with an axe to grind. My Senator probably accepted these "free services" of "interns" in an attempt to save office expense (or maybe, he had little choice in the matter). The rot goes very deep in America – anybody who thinks that we can still vote in good government is not yet awake.

  5. Just want to say your article is as surprising. The clearness to your submit is just excellent and that i can suppose you are a professional on this subject. Well together with your permission let me to grasp your RSS feed to keep updated with forthcoming post. Thank you one million and please continue the gratifying work.

Comments are closed.