Views On Snowden: Are the Times A-Changin’?


It’s rare that I write about good news. But the editorial from yesterday’s New York Times is really good news.

Entitled “Edward Snowden, Whistle-Blower,” the Times editorial board praises and defends Snowden’s decision to leak information about the NSA and argue he deserves some kind of clemency or pardon.

Considering the enormous value of the information he has revealed, and the abuses he has exposed, Mr. Snowden deserves better than a life of permanent exile, fear and flight. He may have committed a crime to do so, but he has done his country a great service. It is time for the United States to offer Mr. Snowden a plea bargain or some form of clemency that would allow him to return home…

…The shrill brigade of his critics say Mr. Snowden has done profound damage to intelligence operations of the United States, but none has presented the slightest proof that his disclosures really hurt the nation’s security. Many of the mass-collection programs Mr. Snowden exposed would work just as well if they were reduced in scope and brought under strict outside oversight, as the presidential panel recommended.

When someone reveals that government officials have routinely and deliberately broken the law, that person should not face life in prison at the hands of the same government.

To help make their point, the Times lists the following bullet points as evidence of the value of Snowden’s leaks:

  • The N.S.A. broke federal privacy laws, or exceeded its authority, thousands of times per year, according to the agency’s own internal auditor.
  • The agency broke into the communications links of major data centers around the world, allowing it to spy on hundreds of millions of user accounts and infuriating the Internet companies that own the centers. Many of those companies are now scrambling to install systems that the N.S.A. cannot yet penetrate.
  • The N.S.A. systematically undermined the basic encryption systems of the Internet, making it impossible to know if sensitive banking or medical data is truly private, damaging businesses that depended on this trust.
  • His leaks revealed that James Clapper Jr., the director of national intelligence, lied to Congress when testifying in March that the N.S.A. was not collecting data on millions of Americans. (There has been no discussion of punishment for that lie.)
  • The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court rebuked the N.S.A. for repeatedly providing misleading information about its surveillance practices, according to a ruling made public because of the Snowden documents. One of the practices violated the Constitution, according to the chief judge of the court.
  • A federal district judge ruled earlier this month that the phone-records-collection program probably violates the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution. He called the program “almost Orwellian” and said there was no evidence that it stopped any imminent act of terror.

So why is this good news? I think it’s an important sign of where general attitudes in the country are when even the New York Times – usually (but not always) an outlet that upholds the government’s legitimacy and the status quo – defends a dissident whistleblower who is essentially Public Enemy Number 1. I would not necessarily have expected the Times to come down on the side of Snowden like it did and that is encouraging.

Jesselyn Radack of Government Accountability Project, speaks to that at Daily Kos, writing “The chorus of voices for rolling back NSA mass surveillance includes leading Members of Congress from both parties, federal judges and the President’s own hand-picked review panel. The voices calling for clemency for Snowden includes NSA Snowden task force leader Rick Ledgett, Silicon Valley’s tech giants, the ACLU and now, the New York Times.”

At Reason, J.D. Tuccille argues 2013 saw a significant shift in the way people view those who defy the state:

For some high-profile people who publicly told the government to go to hell, 2013 was, personally, a bit rough. Information freedom activist Aaron Swartz took his own lifeunder threat of a brutal prison sentence. Revealer of inconvenient government secrets Bradley/Chelsea Manning actually ended up in prison. And surveillance whistleblower Edward Snowden went into exile in Russia to escape what promised to be a “fair” trial followed by a first-class hanging. But tough consequences aren’t unusual for people who defy the state. What was different and encouraging was how many people rallied behind Swartz, Manning, Snowden, and other rebels, explicitly siding with them over the government, in opposition to the powers-that-be.

…In years past, government officials would have counted on the public to boo and hiss at Snowden on command. You’re not supposed to spill the government’s secrets to the world at large.

But Americans are horrified by those secrets—published revelations of NSA snooping have helped drive public revulsion at “big government” to record high levels. Snowden himself gets more of a split decision, but over a third of people tell Reason-Rupe that what he did makes him a patriot (with even higher support for him among younger Americans). That’s almost equal to the percentage of respondents who give him a thumbs-down. Those would have been unthinkable numbers in a different era.

I agree with that. I think in an earlier era, people like Snowden would be far more universally condemned. As Bob Dylan famously prophesied, the times they are a-changin. And despite the cascade of horrible news that provides endless fodder for my own writing here, it’s important to acknowledge the good.

30 thoughts on “Views On Snowden: Are the Times A-Changin’?”

  1. Times are changing but the NYT editorial isn't anything to be excited about.

    Since the beginning of October, the establishment has gradually become more and more pro-Snowden. This isn't because the establishment is becoming anti-establishment. It's because the way the Snowden material is being released and covered does not threaten the establishment.

    Richard Cohen's column signaled the turn:

  2. This morning I posted this comment to the NYT — which they actually published:

    "This is a signal turning point in American media.

    For the New York Times to publicly write this editorial, "Edward Snowden,
    Whistle-Blower" signals a turn as truthful, dramatic, and far reaching
    as Walter Cronkite's February '68 "Report from Vietnam" — which media
    truthfulness caused LBJ to say, "If we've lost Cronkite, we've lost the

    President Obama should realize, "If we've lost the NYT, we've lost the Empire".

    The long and continuing disguised tyranny of secret spying on the American
    public, as well as other unconstitutional hidden actions against our
    'citizens', as if they were 'subjects', exposes a disguised domestic
    Empire running a "war that is lost".

    The extent of this dramatic and expansive truth about the vast central powers aligned against American citizens will become even more clear in comparison to the unwinnable Vietnam war as it becomes crystal clear in 2014 that
    Snowden's truth-telling 'exposes' not merely the NSA spying but also the
    'exposure' of the Disguised Global Empire that has 'captured' and now
    fully "Occupies" our former country.

    Best luck and love to the fast expanding 'Occupy the Empire' educational and non-violent revolutionary movement against this deceitful and Disguised Global
    EMPIRE, which can't so easily be identified as wearing Red Coats, Red
    Stars, nor funny looking Nazi helmets —- quite YET!

    Liberty, democracy, justice, and equality
    Violent ('Vichy' disguised)

    Alan MacDonald
    Sanford, Maine

      to those who wish for Snowden's prosecution, would they rather persue this avenue and
      discard the 46 suggestions by the Obama Panel?
      Further: the crime, or crimes, he alledgely committed; are they of lesser or greater weight
      than the the calculable benefits/corrections?
      Another "traitor" once quoted what would appear to apply to the acts of Edward Snowden:

      "If there's something wrong;
      those who have the ability to take action, have the responsibility to take action."
      — Thomas Jefferson

  3. This is good news :)

    But at the same time, let's remember that Daniel Ellsberg received ZERO days in prison for leaking the Pentagon Papers.

    Today, Bradley Manning, whose pre-trial treatment makes Ellsberg's look like a day at a spa, will be spending most of his life, potentially, in a US dungeon, for exposing US war crimes, crimes against peace, and crimes against humanity.

    Obama has prosecuted more whistle-blowers than all US presidents combined.

    The times better f#$%$ be changing for the better, because to go down from here means descending into some dark, dark territory – the kind of repression that has been used in US imperial satellites in Latin America, the Middle East, and elsewhere.

  4. “I've said before and I believe this is an important conversation that we needed to have. I've also said before that the way in which these disclosures happened have been damaging to the United States and damaging to our intelligence capabilities. And I think that there was a way for us to have this conversation without that damage.”

    –Barack Obama, December 20, 2013

    It's not like Snowden set off car bombs or joined with mercenary terrorists in an effort to overthrow the government, destroying property and killing Americans in the process. Mr. Obama: if Snowden is a "criminal" simply for what he did, what exactly does this make your "freedom fighters" in Syria? So-called "freedom fighters" you're openly training and arming? You can't have it both ways here chief…

  5. Gucci Shoes UK,
    Polo Outlet Online,
    Ralph Lauren Outlet Online,
    Ralph Lauren UK,
    Beats by Dre,
    Sacs Longchamp Pairs,
    Canada Goose Outlet,
    Hollister UK Shops,
    Michael Kors Outlet Online,
    Marc Jacobs Outlet,
    Michael Kors Outlet,
    North Jackets Clearance,
    Burberry Outlet Online,
    North Clearance Outlet Online,
    Coach Factory,
    Coach Outlet Online, Coach Outlet USA,

  6. Thank you with regard to expressing great facts. The following is easiest way available for you. obtain peptides on have confidence in Peptide Labs. We offer your 100% high quality investigation peptides for your purchases having extreme comfort and also advantage.

  7. Thanks again for the great quality web blog posts that you provide. You're writing skills are amazing and I'll be coming back for updates.

  8. Many thanks regarding discussing good details. This is proper way for you personally. purchase peptides in believe in Peptide Labs. Currently the particular 100% good quality exploration peptides to buy along with maximum comfort and also comfort.

  9. s puede absolutamente imposible pasar desapercibido, tal vez en el sentimiento del pueblo, donde la persona que tome itpicamente el inflamado, podr Por supuesto, Sale para la gente com La presencia de pedrerper estrellas son en realidad siempre haciendo el favor para n sern bajo de zapatosltimo, a su wardrobe La suela roja conocida Louboutin Botas y tac El toque franc Formaron abundando zapatos lograr un fan

    Seg El invierno est No importa el estilo que busca, encontrar No obstante lo trato con los fan Como siempre, Louboutin nunca falla en mostrar la capacidad de innovaci En realidad se puede observar especialmente asombrado de estofor todas las Louboutin Plano mujeres, zapatos juegan un papel importante en su imagen, asa te pones Christian Louboutin bombas como las estrellas, y usted se sentirnica de color rojo se ha convertido en el barato Louboutin Bombas logotipo desde que aparecimo mejorar su imagen de sbles que tenemos en venta now

    n que incluye la plataforma, plataforma oculta, bombas peep toe, botas y asmil son una vlo puede haber un par de diversas etiquetas de arranque que pueda comprobar hacia botas de Christian Louboutin que pasa a ser validados Louboutin Botas venta de esta etiqueta Aunque no se puede decir definitivamente que Christian Louboutin opiniones van a ser critu de la moda antes de que los logros de esta Christian Louboutin "belleza salvaje" Exposici la dise?adora Stella McCartney Asociaci estn para sus suelas rojas Dise?ador Louboutin tambindose con total glamour Cuando acompa?

  10. Nice post. I’d been checking frequently this web site using this program . amazed! Extremely helpful info exclusively the remaining section I actually handle this sort of info very much. I became trying to find that information to get a extremely lengthy moment. Thank you as well as with success. Here you'll find New York Times Store Coupon Codes 2014 – 2015.

Comments are closed.