Ukraine, Crimea, and Washington’s Pointless Geo-Political Contest With Russia

In response to the revolution in Ukraine, Moscow has ordered a 150,000-troop Russian military exercise in the semi-autonomous region of Crimea, right on Ukraine’s border. Amid the commotion, pro and anti- Russian residents residents of Crimea have protested.

Dmitri Trenin and Andrew S. Weiss at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace give a brief primer on the Crimea situation:

Crimea is a very special—and delicate—case. It is Ukraine’s only autonomous republic, though its autonomy was sharply curtailed in the mid-1990s. Its population of nearly 2 million is about 60 percent Russian, many of whom are retired Russian military personnel. Russia’s naval base in Sevastopol is home to some 15,000 active-duty servicemen, and much of the city essentially lives off of the base. About 12 percent of Crimeans are Tatars, who are generally loyal to Kyiv due to their tragic history. (They were persecuted and repatriated by Stalin for alleged disloyalty at the end of World War II and were only able to return to Crimea at the very end of the Soviet period.) Throughout independent Ukraine’s twenty-plus-year history, Crimea’s residents, only 24 percent of whom are ethnic Ukrainians, have seen themselves as a breed apart from the Ukrainian mainstream.

They explain that Russia’s military exercise could be a dangerous move:

It would be a surprise if Russia moved to annex the region outright. Although Putin has maintained his silence on the situation in Ukraine since this past weekend, events on the ground are challenging Ukraine’s territorial integrity and raising the possibility that Russian troops will become directly involved in pulling the country apart.

Putin’s hand could be forced (and conflict could come to the region inadvertently) depending on how the new authorities in Kyiv respond to recent moves by the local population. One can easily imagine a harsh Russian response if Kyiv takes rash steps to reassert its authority in Crimea either by sending in troops or by allowing revolutionary paramilitaries to launch a “people’s march” on Crimea.

Today, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel warned Russia not to intervene, failing to mention that (1) Washington has been intervening in Ukraine from the start, and (2) it’s really none of our business what Russia does.

“We expect other nations to respect Ukraine’s sovereignty and avoid provocative action,” Mr. Hagel said. “That’s why I’m closely watching Russia’s military exercises along the Ukrainian border…”

In any case, telling Russia to behave itself has about zero chance of helping the situation. “Russian leaders believe, rightly or wrongly, that the West drove events in Ukraine to the brink of collapse to secure geopolitical advantage over Moscow,” Trenin and Weiss say. “Thus, Western appeals for Russian restraint in the event of a crisis over Crimea are unlikely to resonate.”

But the eagerness in Washington to steer events in Ukraine and beat out Russia in some pointless geopolitical game has not yielded. In this Daily Beast report, Republican leaders Buck McKeon and James Inhofe berate Obama for being too soft on Russia; they both express a deep longing for the Cold War era when it was easier to justify any reckless military action abroad on the grounds of opposing Soviet designs.

David Rhodes, a Reuters columnist, quoted former Romney adviser Nile Gardiner as reiterating Romney’s 2012 line that Russia is America’s greatest geo-political foe and arguing that “an ‘ideological war’ was underway and Putin is winning.”

Gardiner then worries that Washington’s inability to force Russia to lay prostrate at the feet of American power is encouraging other countries to defy their American master: “Putin is viewed by American adversaries and competitors as someone who has stood up to American influence and gotten away with outflanking the United States. Adversaries take note of this and they sense weakness and that’s dangerous. Dissidents also take note.”

Obama’s State Department, which as we know has quietly tried to pull off regime change in Ukraine (only to be outed by a leaked phone conversation), prefers to apply the Republican bellicosity, just to do it quietly:

“What we’re trying to do is work through diplomatic channels with the Russians,” a senior State Department official told Rhodes. “That doesn’t mean going public with some tough rhetoric that might please some domestic constituencies. This is not an era where tough talk gets the job done.”

Tough talk is so 1980. Secrecy is now the American way.

12 thoughts on “Ukraine, Crimea, and Washington’s Pointless Geo-Political Contest With Russia”

    1. …and precisely in what manner do events in that part of the world become "problems" the United States must address with provocative language and threats? Isn't the current disaster of Mideast
      interventionism quite enough for our war loving elites? Can we really afford to threaten Russia with
      military or other actions occurring in their backyard while simultaneously in the Pacific insert ourselves in matters between China and its neighbors? I see not a scintilla of reason or justification for anything we are presently doing abroad. Don't our leaders understand that the only REAL crisis we face is here in our own crumbling nation?

  1. USA needs to get the hell out of everywhere else & NATO needs to be abolished. Both right away. Forza, Vlad!!.

  2. Stale Imperialist inertia animates US polity at home and abroad. Imperium must grow or it will die-there is no steady state to be had with it…..Austerity at home with declining job,income,health care, and retirement security. Divide and rule drievel from Pax Romana scripted onto all current "National Security Apparatus" dealings…….Americans don't even bother to ask anymore the question "What's in it for us?" They intuitively know the answer is NOTHING.
    What we are witnessing is Pax Americana in steep and rapid decline. Patriots will do everything possible to drive a stake in the heart of Pax Americana and restore a Republic.

    1. You have detected "austerity at home"? Have you looked at the printing press the last four years??

  3. Frankly, most contemporary analogies to Hitler or the Nazis are hyperbolic and irrational. But here it is all too appropriate. Cheney has openly argued for the legitimacy of Nazi war crime rationales on national television.

  4. Louis received a $one hundred,000 grant from Microsoft and used it to combine a USB-based mostly ultrasound probe with new smartphone expertise. Using a rudimentary robot, 3-D ultrasound know-how and artificial intelligence applications to create a robotic that can carry out primary surgical duties unassisted.

  5. We cannot savor know-how optimally if we shut our eyes to the negatives, and they are extremely troublesome to specific right here in a single write-up. Nevertheless, I might similar to to conclude by saying that, an accomplishment is savored solely when there are not any strings of pain or stress hooked up to it.

  6. We'd have the most recent technology serving us big time, but unknowingly, we might be lacking out on those teeny-weeny moments of happiness that life bestows on us. Appropriate me for those who must. The sensible meters normally comprise of real time sensor technology that evokes responses in them. This technology for these smart meters is predicated on radio frequency as well as energy line transmission, whichever convenient. Private computer was a completely new idea at the moment.

Comments are closed.