Germany’s Merkel Needs To Ask Tough Questions at NATO Summit

MEMORANDUM FOR: Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany
FROM: Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS)
SUBJECT: Ukraine and NATO

We the undersigned are longtime veterans of U.S. intelligence. We take the unusual step of writing this open letter to you to ensure that you have an opportunity to be briefed on our views prior to the NATO summit on September 4-5.

You need to know, for example, that accusations of a major Russian "invasion" of Ukraine appear not to be supported by reliable intelligence. Rather, the "intelligence" seems to be of the same dubious, politically "fixed" kind used 12 years ago to "justify" the U.S.-led attack on Iraq. We saw no credible evidence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq then; we see no credible evidence of a Russian invasion now. Twelve years ago, former Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder, mindful of the flimsiness of the evidence on Iraqi WMD, refused to join in the attack on Iraq. In our view, you should be appropriately suspicions of charges made by the US State Department and NATO officials alleging a Russian invasion of Ukraine.

President Barack Obama tried yesterday to cool the rhetoric of his own senior diplomats and the corporate media, when he publicly described recent activity in the Ukraine, as "a continuation of what’s been taking place for months now … it’s not really a shift."

Obama, however, has only tenuous control over the policymakers in his administration – who, sadly, lack much sense of history, know little of war, and substitute anti-Russian invective for a policy. One year ago, hawkish State Department officials and their friends in the media very nearly got Mr. Obama to launch a major attack on Syria based, once again, on "intelligence" that was dubious, at best.

Largely because of the growing prominence of, and apparent reliance on, intelligence we believe to be spurious, we think the possibility of hostilities escalating beyond the borders of Ukraine has increased significantly over the past several days. More important, we believe that this likelihood can be avoided, depending on the degree of judicious skepticism you and other European leaders bring to the NATO summit next week.

Experience With Untruth

Hopefully, your advisers have reminded you of NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen’s checkered record for credibility. It appears to us that Rasmussen’s speeches continue to be drafted by Washington. This was abundantly clear on the day before the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq when, as Danish Prime Minister, he told his Parliament: "Iraq has weapons of mass destruction. This is not something we just believe. We know."

Photos can be worth a thousand words; they can also deceive. We have considerable experience collecting, analyzing, and reporting on all kinds of satellite and other imagery, as well as other kinds of intelligence. Suffice it to say that the images released by NATO on August 28 provide a very flimsy basis on which to charge Russia with invading Ukraine. Sadly, they bear a strong resemblance to the images shown by Colin Powell at the UN on February 5, 2003 that, likewise, proved nothing.

That same day, we warned President Bush that our former colleague analysts were "increasingly distressed at the politicization of intelligence" and told him flatly, "Powell’s presentation does not come close" to justifying war. We urged Mr. Bush to "widen the discussion … beyond the circle of those advisers clearly bent on a war for which we see no compelling reason and from which we believe the unintended consequences are likely to be catastrophic."

Consider Iraq today. Worse than catastrophic. Although President Vladimir Putin has until now showed considerable reserve on the conflict in the Ukraine, it behooves us to remember that Russia, too, can "shock and awe." In our view, if there is the slightest chance of that kind of thing eventually happening to Europe because of Ukraine, sober-minded leaders need to think this through very carefully.

If the photos that NATO and the US have released represent the best available "proof" of an invasion from Russia, our suspicions increase that a major effort is under way to fortify arguments for the NATO summit to approve actions that Russia is sure to regard as provocative. Caveat emptor is an expression with which you are no doubt familiar. Suffice it to add that one should be very cautious regarding what Mr. Rasmussen, or even Secretary of State John Kerry, are peddling.

We trust that your advisers have kept you informed regarding the crisis in Ukraine from the beginning of 2014, and how the possibility that Ukraine would become a member of NATO is anathema to the Kremlin. According to a February 1, 2008 cable (published by WikiLeaks) from the US embassy in Moscow to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, US Ambassador William Burns was called in by Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, who explained Russia’s strong opposition to NATO membership for Ukraine.

Lavrov warned pointedly of "fears that the issue could potentially split the country in two, leading to violence or even, some claim, civil war, which would force Russia to decide whether to intervene." Burns gave his cable the unusual title, "NYET MEANS NYET: RUSSIA’S NATO ENLARGEMENT REDLINES," and sent it off to Washington with IMMEDIATE precedence. Two months later, at their summit in Bucharest NATO leaders issued a formal declaration that "Georgia and Ukraine will be in NATO."

Just yesterday, Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseny Yatsenyuk used his Facebook page to claim that, with the approval of Parliament that he has requested, the path to NATO membership is open. Yatsenyuk, of course, was Washington’s favorite pick to become prime minister after the February 22 coup d’etat in Kiev. "Yats is the guy," said Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland a few weeks before the coup, in an intercepted telephone conversation with US Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt. You may recall that this is the same conversation in which Nuland said, "Fuck the EU."

Timing of the Russian "Invasion"

The conventional wisdom promoted by Kiev just a few weeks ago was that Ukrainian forces had the upper hand in fighting the anti-coup federalists in southeastern Ukraine, in what was largely portrayed as a mop-up operation. But that picture of the offensive originated almost solely from official government sources in Kiev. There were very few reports coming from the ground in southeastern Ukraine. There was one, however, quoting Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, that raised doubt about the reliability of the government’s portrayal.

According to the "press service of the President of Ukraine" on August 18, Poroshenko called for a "regrouping of Ukrainian military units involved in the operation of power in the East of the country. … Today we need to do the rearrangement of forces that will defend our territory and continued army offensives," said Poroshenko, adding, "we need to consider a new military operation in the new circumstances."

If the "new circumstances" meant successful advances by Ukrainian government forces, why would it be necessary to "regroup," to "rearrange" the forces? At about this time, sources on the ground began to report a string of successful attacks by the anti-coup federalists against government forces. According to these sources, it was the government army that was starting to take heavy casualties and lose ground, largely because of ineptitude and poor leadership.

Ten days later, as they became encircled and/or retreated, a ready-made excuse for this was to be found in the "Russian invasion." That is precisely when the fuzzy photos were released by NATO and reporters like the New York Times’ Michael Gordon were set loose to spread the word that "the Russians are coming." (Michael Gordon was one of the most egregious propagandists promoting the war on Iraq.)

No Invasion – But Plenty Other Russian Support

The anti-coup federalists in southeastern Ukraine enjoy considerable local support, partly as a result of government artillery strikes on major population centers. And we believe that Russian support probably has been pouring across the border and includes, significantly, excellent battlefield intelligence. But it is far from clear that this support includes tanks and artillery at this point – mostly because the federalists have been better led and surprisingly successful in pinning down government forces.

At the same time, we have little doubt that, if and when the federalists need them, the Russian tanks will come.

This is precisely why the situation demands a concerted effort for a ceasefire, which you know Kiev has so far been delaying. What is to be done at this point? In our view, Poroshenko and Yatsenyuk need to be told flat-out that membership in NATO is not in the cards – and that NATO has no intention of waging a proxy war with Russia – and especially not in support of the ragtag army of Ukraine. Other members of NATO need to be told the same thing.

For the Steering Group, Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity

  • William Binney, former Technical Director, World Geopolitical & Military Analysis, NSA; co-founder, SIGINT Automation Research Center (ret.)
  • David MacMichael, National Intelligence Council (ret.)
  • Ray McGovern, former US Army infantry/intelligence officer & CIA analyst (ret.)
  • Elizabeth Murray, Deputy National Intelligence Officer for Middle East (ret.)
  • Todd E. Pierce, MAJ, US Army Judge Advocate (Ret.)
  • Coleen Rowley, Division Counsel & Special Agent, FBI (ret.)
  • Ann Wright, Col., US Army (ret.); Foreign Service Officer (resigned)

131 thoughts on “Germany’s Merkel Needs To Ask Tough Questions at NATO Summit”

  1. I used to be more than happy to seek out this web-site.I needed to thanks in your time for this excellent read!! I undoubtedly enjoying each little little bit of it and I’ve you bookmarked to take a look at new stuff you weblog post.

  2. I’m impressed, I have to say. Really hardly ever do I encounter a blog that’s each educative and entertaining, and let me let you know, you’ve hit the nail on the head. Your thought is excellent; the issue is one thing that not enough individuals are speaking intelligently about. I’m very joyful that I stumbled across this in my search for something regarding this.

  3. excellent post, very informative. I ponder why the other specialists of this sector don’t understand this. You must proceed your writing. I’m confident, you have a huge readers’ base already!

  4. Why Ukraine does not use projectiles with chips that would refute the charges against her on the losses of civilians?

  5. Seite wird geschrieben/text will writtn
    Telepathic telekinesis terror
    divided by telepath´s
    telepathietelekineseterror.blogspot.com

    I want warn all

    Fakts are there are Telepath's and they are able to telekinesis. They can controls people by showing them that they can kill you and make you crazy.
    The possibilities are only a hypothesis.

    This ist the most probability possibility:
    Are vou hearing ghosts demon, devil or maybe they are telling you that they are God. Maybe some people think they were becoming irradiatet from Mindcontrol weapons or rays from satelite. I think all people who can hear and /or fell that are influenced by telepath with telekinetic forces.
    The telepath are able to control people by show them that they can kill you and you can do nothing because no one belief you. This will be tested at human like me to control person in politics an d economy maybe military too.

    Request:
    Because maybe that telepath are the cause of big problems in the world.
    Everybody who knows them should talk about them. I think that a lot people are knowing about them but don´t like speak about because the telepath are lying and say:
    You have to don´t speak about telepath, if you talk, talk about voice or vote don’t say the word Telepath.
    Or they let you know that they can kill you.
    Or: Say nothing no one will belive you you´ll get crazy.
    So They have the possibility to control all

    It´s important to talk about.!!!

    Systematic of the evil Telepath (properties they use systematically)
    <no one knows about or believe that
    -They will tell you that often and hope that´s enough that you aren’t talking about
    -But you have to talk about, so you can be sure if they kill you, someone known’s about.
    <They let hear you voices
    -There own voice
    -Voices about other person in the the acoustic of all
    -Voices of your friends or old friends you haven´t seen long time because they know your
    Memorys
    < If you are talking about other person you don´t hear them loudly
    -They want that you are every time in bars talking with people so they can talk about terror
    maybe killing and you aren´t hearing them
    <before you are knowing that what you are hearing are telepath
    -They want´s to manipulate you that no one believe you or every one think you are crazy.
    -At the beginning they let you hearing only voices.
    -They want that you became crazy or get into panic.
    <If you check that are Telepath they get more crazy and use telekinesis.
    -maybe they say you a story:
    We work for police you are becoming a telepath and you have bound with a lot of
    People you need Neuroleptika to end the boundings you have to get them in
    psychiatric clinic.
    <They want´s to control you with fear
    They can let feel you something like:
    -Sharp pain or pressure on the heart
    -burning in the lunge
    -let feel dizziness
    -heart throb in two different
    -1st you feel the heart throb but your puls is normal (telepathic (not real))
    -2nd you feel the heart throb and with them the pulst (telekinetic (is REAL))
    If they want that you get a heart attack you´ll get heart throb by telekinesis.
    <Psychologize
    -they know what you think about and hear them, they also know your mental stress level.
    -They uses psychical traps so you´ll get crazy.
    Typical Example We don´t kill you! What sure, puhh. Now he think again we don´t kill him, ha ha ha.

  6. ???? ???? ???? ??? ???? , ?????? ????? ???? ???? ??????? ?? ???? ??? ?????? ??? ????
    ???? ??????? ???? ???????
    ????? ???? ????
    ??? ???? 2015 ?? ????? ????? ???????
    ????? ???? ???? ???? ???? ?? ????? ???? ??????? , ??? ??? ??? ???? ???? ?????? ???? ??????? ?? ???????? ???? ?????? ??? ????? ????? ???? 2015
    ????? ???? ????
    ????? ????? ??? ???? ?????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ?????? ??????? ?? ????? ??? ????
    ????? 250 ???? ????? , ?????? ?? ???? ????? ??????? ????? 250 ????? ???? ?? ???? ????? ?? ??? ??????
    ????? 250 ?????
    ??? ????? ?????? ????? ????? ?? ????? ??? ????? ????
    ????? ?????? ?????? ??????? , ?????? ????? ????? ?? ?????? ????? ???????? ?????? 2015 ?? ????? ?????? ?? ??? ???????? ??? ????
    ????? ?????? 2015
    ??????? ?????? ?????? ????? ?????? 2015 ???????
    ???? ?????? ??????? , ?? ???? ?? ????? ?????? ??? 3 ???? ???? ????? ??? ???? ?????? ??? 2015 ??? ???? ???
    ????
    ???? ?????? ??????? ??????? 2015 ?????? ?? ?????? ??? ????????? ????? ??? ???? ???? ??????
    ???? ???? ????? ???????? , ???? ???? ??? ????? 9 , ????? ???? ???? ??????? 2015 ?? ????? ??? ???????
    ????
    ???? ????? ?????? ???? ???? ????? ???????? ???? ?????
    snapchat online is free app , you can download snapchat for free to your pc or try snapchat online
    online
    now for free your snapchat download

  7. Chicago Water Sports activities Leases is the one full-time vendor in the Chicagoland space renting and promoting the Flyboard. Using the facility from a Jet Ski engine, the Flyboard propels riders above the water like James Bond's backpack and allows customers to hurtle by means of the water like turbocharged dolphins. Zapata Racing posted a video on YouTube which was considered more than 2.5 million times in 15 days. Learn to water launch the kite. http://www.drawerbot.com/

  8. Water Sports activities Towables are quick changing into the primary water exercise for households and thrill seekers alike this season. Swimming is a superb cardiovascular train that lends to diverse well being advantages. With its fabulous, yr-spherical warm climate, California has been synonymous with surfing and the sporty, tanned, blonde-haired sorts who've participated in the sport because the sixties. http://www.vaddhana.org/

  9. With a mutual love for watersports and the sea, we have spent many a day trip on the ocean surfing, kitesurfing and arise paddleboarding. So, http://aultphoto.org/ you'll be able to imagine my delight when I heard that Judd was opening his personal enterprise… the aptly named, Anguilla Watersports.

  10. With world-class service, skilled instruction and top quality gear, Anguilla Watersports is all about enjoying the ocean to the fullest http://polygator.org/ and within the most secure means potential. No matter how a lot you enjoy your recreation, safety always come first.

  11. Studying to take a flip at 70km/h whereas utilizing your hand as a hydroplane together with your ft firmly in entrance of you instead of underneath you is a enjoyable problem that any water sport fanatic should attempt at the least once. http://www.opthird.com/

  12. Word of love and appreciation and greeting fulfillment and private
    Greeting fill all the meanings of brotherhood and friendship
    Greetings from the Heart to Heart
    Thank you with all my heart
    GREAT ARTICLE TNX FOR WORK I LOVE THIS
    ????? ????
    and welcom to d great blog for cooking gamesopo

Comments are closed.