I wonder if there’s a number that demarcates the upper limit of acceptable civilian casualties in Gaza. Is it ten thousand? Twenty thousand? Thirty thousand? And how about dead children? How many children is Israel free to kill in trade for the children killed by Hamas, and how many non-combatants total can it kill in exchange for the elusive goal of “wiping Hamas from the face of the Earth”? Is there a number? Or is the acceptable number of non-combatants and children killed simply an as-yet undetermined statistic that will eventually be entered into a column on a spreadsheet in a soon-to-be dusty after-action report?
Of course, I ask these questions within the context of the Global War On Terror. The US piled-up hundreds of thousands of deaths in the wake of 9/11 … and even went to a country with no demonstrable connection to 9/11 to collectively punish them for something they didn’t do. The US also collectively punished the Afghan people with bombs and drones and a grinding occupation because of their geographical proximity to al-Qaeda. In the process, the US added the deaths of hundreds of thousands of bystanders to its own spreadsheet of vengeance. There really wasn’t an upper limit on the non-American casualties in any of Uncle Sam’s post-9/11 punitive pursuits, which is important because what the US did after 9/11 has become a model of contemporary war-making … that is, if the enemy is “terrorism” or “terrorists” or, in a stroke of marketing genius, if you are fighting the amorphous specter of “terror.”
Continue reading “The Foghorn of War: The Magic Word of War”