Roasted Rumsfeld

Spencer Ackerman has the whole transcript of Rumsfeld’s Kuwait Roasting, in addition to the armor issue the US media focussed on. A sample:

Q: Yes, sir. I was wanting to know why I cannot enlist as a single parent in the regular Army, but I can enlist in the National Guard and be deployed?

Q: Specialist Skarwin (Sp?) HHD 42nd Engineer Brigade. Mr. Secretary [Cheers] my question is with the current mission of the National Guard and Reserves being the same as our active duty counterparts, when are more of our benefits going to line up to the same as theirs, for example, retirement? [Cheers] [Applause]

Q: Good morning, sir. Staff Sergeant Latazinsky (sp) 1st COSCOM (sp), Fort Bragg, [Cheers] North Carolina. Yes, sir. My husband and myself, we both joined a volunteer Army. Currently, I’m serving under the Stop Loss Program. I would like to know how much longer do you foresee the military using this program?

Read the rest…

LATER: Hey, Rumsfeld, you disgusting, pitiful excuse for a human being, at least you can’t lie to Spc. Cody Wentz of Williston, N.D. anymore.

Fallujah – a US Prison Camp?

Chris Albritton critiques one of George Paine’s Warblogging posts which analyzes the authoritarian utopia planned for Fallujah

A comparison to the Warsaw Ghetto is tempting, but is perhaps a bit too extreme. We can only hope and assume that the residents of Fallujah, under their new American police state, will enjoy sustenance and somewhat adequate medical care. I think that the more appropriate analogy may be to a massive 300,000-strong Miami-sized prison camp.

The American occupation authorities in Iraq are creating a massive city-sized prison camp for Fallujah. They realize that they can’t arrest every resident of Fallujah because they don’t have enough space in Saddam’s old prisons. So instead, being the problem solvers that they are, they have decided to turn the entire city into one big prison. With this prison being a “model”, the other cities of Iraq can’t be far behind.

This is the liberation of Iraq?

Continue reading “Fallujah – a US Prison Camp?”

Not That Glenn Reynolds Would Try to Mislead Anyone

Oh no. Perish the thought! He’s running with that Yushchenko poisoning "confirmed" story from the London Times – many hours after it’s been thoroughly debunked by the Associated Press, which reports:

"The cause of the illness that has left Ukrainian opposition leader Viktor Yushchenko’s face pockmarked is still not known, the director of the hospital that treated him said Wednesday, rejecting a report that the presidential candidate was poisoned.

"…Doctors are still running tests to try to determine what caused the illness, said Dr. Michael Zimpfer, the Rudolfinerhaus director.

"…Zimpfer rejected as ‘entirely untrue’ a story in the Wednesday edition of the London daily The Times, which quoted Dr. Nikolai Korpan – the Rudolfinerhaus physician who oversaw Yushchenko’s treatment – as saying that Yushchenko had been poisoned and the intention was to kill the candidate.

"Korpan also was quoted as denying making the remarks."

You mean the news media is – yikes! – biased??? The Times was … lying? Omigod, say it isn’t so!

Glenn was even busy implicating Vladimir Putin as the culprit. Evidence? Who needs evidence? Certainly not a professor of law….

To those of us with built-in BS-detectors, however, it wasn’t hard to anticipate this particular debunking. The Times story claims that the poisoning has been "confirmed," but somehow neglects to name the mysterious substance that supposedly disfigured Yushchenko’s once-handsome visage. Oh, and, even though the "poisoning" diagnosis is "confirmed," there’s just one minor complication:

"We need to check him again here in Vienna. If we received him today, we could finish the whole investigation in two or three days."

Unfortunately, however, according to the Times’s Jeremy Page — "reporting" from Kiev — "a spokeswoman said [Yushchenko] had no plans to travel to Vienna." Gee, so I guess that means the "mystery" wouldn’t be cleared up until … after the election. How convenient.

The key tip off, however, that the whole story was bogus from beginning to end is that the Cato Institute’s resident neocon and Karen Kean Lopez of National Review both believed it – and no doubt still do. Ideology trumps reality every time.

Ron Paul Rides Again!

Once again Ron Paul is totally on the mark re the lurid, uncivil possibilities posed by the potential imposition of a US ID card – and called to mind the battle already going on in Japan over Juki Net, launched in 2003, and causing a ruckus there (e.g, Japanese Government Bans Security Researcher’s Speech.) God knowswhat we in the US would do if an ID card were implemented, lots of chaos, civil actions, law suits, breakdown of much we currently hold dear – privacy, freedom, liberty of our persons!

Nichols countdown—7

(see 10 for introduction)
6 next

Tuesday John Nichols wrote about Tommy Thompson’s return to Wisconsin from the Bush cabinet, it’s not worth providing a link, that was his 103rd Capital Times column of the year and the 103rd time he’s failed to mention “Israel” (or “The Zionist Entity”).

It was nice to see that Commondreams posted Ray McGovern’s article on the major terrorism conference held in the wake of the publication of the study by a panel of the U.S. Defense Science Board. Bush’s exploitation of the “war on terrorism” and the amount of resources squandered therein are big concerns of John. One wonders, but not too much, if John read the article and recognized himself, if Commondreams is aware that one of its biggest contributors should have recognized himself.

The conference “proved to be highly instructive for what was not addressed.” Only “a rude question from the audience” raised the DSB study’s point that “Muslims do not ‘hate our freedom,’ but rather, they hate our policies. The overwhelming majority voice their objections to what they see as one-sided support in favor of Israel and against Palestinian rights…”

In response to another questioner’s pressing, a RAND expert “acknowledged that the United States has a ‘bad reputation,’ but insisted that this is ‘unavoidable’ because, for example, U.S. support for Israel is ‘immutable.'” In other words, Lawrence of Arabia was wrong, everything is written.

Does it require courage to “state simply the conclusions that fall out of one’s analysis?” To paraphrase William Arrowsmith, is the intellectual climate at RAND and the New York Times as uncongenial to “telling it like it is” as the Mojave Desert to a clutch of Druid priests?”

Never mind, here’s the real question–does John Nichols have the courage of his immutability enough to make it through seven more columns without mentioning “Israel?” Remember, last year he copped out on December 30.

notes

As Associate Editor of The Capital Times, John does accomodate local activists on occasion, he did so Tuesday. If you think I’m being unfair to him or in honor of his streak, support the Rafah Playground project.

Alternet has posted a relevant speech by Russ Feingold over which John can gush safely.

My Name is Rachel Corrie

Via Mark Elf at jews sans frontieres: Perdition II – this time it’s personal

“ALAN RICKMAN is about to become the latest Hollywood star to light the blue touchpaper on the powderkeg that is Arab-Israeli politics.” Or should that say “the latest ex. -Hollywood star” since “he is thought to be sympathetic towards the Palestinian cause”. Anyway, Alan Rickman is directing a play titled My Name is Rachel Corrie. which is due to open at the Royal Court in 2005…..but will it open at the Royal Court next year?

Read the rest….