Horrible Trauma Cases in Iraq

Atrios links the Washington Post story everyone’s talking about today about the horrific injuries that the military hospitals in Iraq are dealing with and the trauma it is causing for the doctors and surgical teams. Atrios says:

This stuff is just so horrible. I really hope Kerry gets out in front of this and proposes massive increases in VA funds. You can have my goddamn tax cut back. I’d rather pay out the money that way and get some quality care for these people than throw it into their change cups a few years from now.

I hate what these bastards have done, and I hate that they’d rather bankrupt the government than take care of the mess they’ve made. Assholes.

Which I think rather misses the point of the article. The problem isn’t lack of funds, it’s that these guys are surviving hideous injuries that would have killed them just a few years ago.

More and more in Iraq, combat surgeons say, the wounds involve severe damage to the head and eyes — injuries that leave soldiers brain damaged or blind, or both, and the doctors who see them first struggling against despair.

For months the gravest wounds have been caused by roadside bombs — improvised explosives that negate the protection of Kevlar helmets by blowing shrapnel and dirt upward into the face. In addition, firefights with guerrillas have surged recently, causing a sharp rise in gunshot wounds to the only vital area not protected by body armor.

The neurosurgeons at the 31st Combat Support Hospital measure the damage in the number of skulls they remove to get to the injured brain inside, a procedure known as a craniotomy. “We’ve done more in eight weeks than the previous neurosurgery team did in eight months,” Poffenbarger said. “So there’s been a change in the intensity level of the war.”

With advanced surgical techniques and the military’s capability for moving casualties from the field to the hospital in record quick times, they are saving people with devastating brain injuries and people who are blinded and disfigured and paralyzed. There is nothing more money can do for injuries like this, which is what the doctors in the article point out.

“See all that dark stuff? That’s dead brain,” he said. “That ain’t gonna regenerate. And that’s not uncommon. That’s really not uncommon. We do craniotomies on average, lately, of one a day.”

“We can save you,” the surgeon said. “You might not be what you were.”

Accurate statistics are not yet available on recovery from this new round of battlefield brain injuries, an obstacle that frustrates combat surgeons. But judging by medical literature and surgeons’ experience with their own patients “three or four months from now 50 to 60 percent will be functional and doing things,” said Maj. Richard Gullick.

“Functional,” he said, means “up and around, but with pretty significant disabilities,” including paralysis.

‘Broken soldiers’

The remaining 40 percent to 50 percent of patients include those whom the surgeons send to Europe, and on to the United States, with no prospect of regaining consciousness. The practice, subject to review after gathering feedback from families, assumes that loved ones will find value in holding the soldier’s hand before confronting the decision to remove life support.

“I’m actually glad I’m here and not at home, tending to all the social issues with all these broken soldiers,” Carroll said.

But the toll on the combat medical staff is itself acute, and unrelenting.

In a comprehensive Army survey of troop morale across Iraq, taken in September, the unit with the lowest spirits was the one that ran the combat hospitals until the 31st arrived in late January. The three months since then have been substantially more intense.

“We’ve all reached our saturation for drama trauma,” said Maj. Greg Kidwell, head nurse in the emergency room.

The real solution to this problem is to get those Americans out of Iraq, not to throw money at yet another government program. Besides, if you want the best of care for these broken people why would you send them to a shabby hospital system like the VA anyway? Why throw money at the VA when there are thousands of state of the art hospitals all over the US? Let them go to real doctors at real hospitals, not government facilities which are all run as efficiently as Amtrak. Better yet, bring them home before any more get hurt.

Anyway, the point is, even if you gave the VA billions, it won’t help. The cases that are demoralizing the doctors are the hopeless ones like brain injuries and missing eyes. These are permanent disabilities. No amount of money will replace eyes or fix an injured brain or spine. A significant number of these soldiers are making the return trip only so their families can see them one last time before they pull the plug.

Poisonous Policies

Will Fallujah and Najaf be the Americans’ Jenin?

The similarities are eery.

This writer also uses the comparison:

U.S. weighs tactics: NATO carrot or Israeli stick

BAGHDAD — The U.S. military, coping with powder kegs in two very different cities in Iraq, is reviewing tactics used in other high-stakes episodes of strife to test the will–and ability–of Iraqis in Fallujah and Najaf to root out violence and hand over opponents of the U.S.-led coalition.

In particular, sources familiar with the discussions said that U.S. military leaders have mulled the consequences of the urban warfare that Israeli soldiers waged in April 2002 in the West Bank town of Jenin, a densely populated Palestinian stronghold of resistance, and negotiations employed in Macedonia in August 2001 when NATO troops were used to cool an armed rebellion in the former Yugoslav republic.

Military and coalition sources said, the hope is to avoid confrontations in Fallujah, a Sunni stronghold, and Najaf, a Shiite holy city, that would cause high casualties or more bad feelings inside and beyond Iraq toward the U.S. occupation.

U.S. military leaders, who were advised by the Israeli army about urban warfare before the Iraq invasion, acknowledge privately that open combat in either city now could be create a situation similar to what happened in Jenin.

Undoubtedly the Iraqis have made the linkage already, as they are acutely aware that their occupation parallels the Israeli occupation of the Palestinians in many respects. This is what Lakhdar Brahimi meant when he referred to Israel’s policies as being “poison in the region.”

New Iraqi Flag Flap

Here’s the ugly flag the Iraqi Puppet Council today agreed should replace the current Iraqi flag.

puppetflag

iraq4_jpgflagboy
..
.
.

Somehow, I don’t think the transplant will take.

For one thing, it looks like the hated Israeli flag.

“When I saw it in the newspaper, I felt very sad,” said Muthana Khalil, 50, a supermarket owner in Saadoun, a commercial area in central Baghdad. “The flags of other Arab countries are red and green and black. Why did they put in these colors that are the same as Israel? Why was the public opinion not consulted?”

Today in the WSJ

Two points from today’s War Street Journal opinion section. First, this editorial, “The Fallujah Stakes,” urges precisely the type of overreaction I counsel against in today’s column. Small wonder. But in the middle of their kill-’em-all routine, the editors insert a little nugget I’m hearing more and more these days: “They can’t be bargained with, they can’t be reasoned with, because for them a peaceful transition to Iraqi control after June 30 means defeat.”

What does this even mean? If the neocons can’t churn out better propaganda than this, why are we supposed to believe they can run the planet? Why does a peaceful transition mean defeat for the insurgents? They could just wait until after such a transition to raise hell. Wouldn’t that be easier, assuming that that’s all they have in mind? The neocons are trying to hide–and the insurgents are fighting against–the reality that there won’t be any transfer of power on June 30.

The second item is a (subscribers only) piece by Jose Maria Aznar called “Appeasement Never Works,” in which the former Spanish PM takes a whizz on his country and its current government. You’ll recall how American “conservatives” shriek every time a politician or other celebrity criticizes Dubya, and how the pitch and decibels soar when the critic is on foreign soil at the time (Dixie Chicks, anyone?). So what to make of this sore loser bashing his country in a foreign newspaper in a foreign language?

LCpl. Boudreaux Non-Update

No news in the case of the Marine who allegedly humiliated some Iraqi kids, but the following story is part of why I’m already tired of the former.

    Marines get suspended sentences for assault

    Two Marines stationed at Iwakuni Marine Corps Air Station received suspended prison sentences Friday after pleading guilty to assaulting two Japanese women.

    Cpl. Joseph P. Benoit received a 14-month prison term suspended for three years, and Lance Cpl. Nathan J. Schuermann’s sentence of one year in prison was suspended for three years, according to a Yamaguchi District Court official.

    Benoit and Schuermann, of Marine Wing Support Squadron 171, pleaded guilty Feb. 6 to bodily assault for attacking two 22-year-old Hiroshima women visiting in Iwakuni city on April 12, 2003.

    According to the prosecutor’s indictment, Benoit, 22, punched one of the women in the head, knocking her to the ground; he then climbed on top of her and grabbed her neck. Schuermann, 22, knocked the other woman to the ground, grabbed her hair and twice smashed her head into the ground.

    Decisions about their future as U.S. Marines have yet to be made, Capt. Stewart Upton, a base spokesman, said late Friday afternoon.

Well, don’t keep the poor things waiting! Continue reading “LCpl. Boudreaux Non-Update”