Enemy of the Month

And the award goes to…Pakistan! Escalating tensions between the US and Pakistan have only been getting worse. As Pepe Escobar notes, this “row”–as it is called by the mainstream media–has the potential to deteriorate quickly into one hot mess:

Expect a festival of MQ-9 Reapers droning North Waziristan to death. What US President Barack Obama calls a tool of “unique capabilities”, for Pashtun farmers is a weapon of terror.

Expect strike after strike conducted out of a control room in Nellis air force base in Nevada.

Expect an array of strategic missile bombings with spectacular collateral damage.

Expect more Joint Special Operations Command-ordered special operations forces “kill/capture” raids.

Expect a new, humongous Joint Prioritized Effects List, just like in Afghanistan; no names, just a list of mobile or satellite phone numbers. If your mobile gets on the list by mistake, you’ll be snuffed the Hellfire way.

Expect deadly, eternal Pashtun vengeance against Americans to be as irreversible as death and taxes.

And most of all, expect a low intensity war to turn volcanic anytime.

Now, to make matters worse, the US is blaming Pakistan as the source for IED’s that plague the war effort in Afghanistan. They claim fertilizer, the main ingredient in IED’s, moves freely across the border of Pakistan and Afghanistan.

While solutions are already being brainstormed by top military brass, two important questions remain concerning these accusations: does the United States have definitive proof, unlike the debunked claims from 2007 that Iran was supplying Iraqi fighters with weapons? And, if true, why doesn’t the US halt all aid in the form of fertilizer to Pakistan that it continues to give year after year?

Barbarous Italians Unimprison, Nonassassinate Possible Criminal

Breaking news in a case that I have diligently ignored for years:

Italian Court Overturns Knox Conviction

PERUGIA, Italy—An Italian appeals court on Monday acquitted American student Amanda Knox of murdering her roommate, a stunning turnaround in Ms. Knox’s yearslong quest to clear her name and end her nightmare journey through the Italian justice system. [Emphasis mine.]

Surprisingly, that’s The Wall Street Journal‘s lede. Why am I surprised? Well, here’s a typical Journal take on sunny Guantanamo Bay.

And here’s a typical Journal take on the assassination of an unindicted rabble-rouser.

Seriously, watch those two videos, especially the second one. Ah, yes, those libertarian law professors

BONUS LINK: Dorothy Rabinowitz defends people convicted* of sex crimes against children!

*And most likely innocent. 

 

Clearly, There’s No Question That If You’re Right, You’re Right

Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta responds to a question about the legality of assassinating Anwar al-Awlaki:

This individual was clearly a terrorist. And yes, he was a citizen, but if you’re a terrorist, you’re a terrorist. And that means that we have the ability to go after those who would threaten to attack the United States and kill Americans. There’s no question that the authority and the ability to go after a terrorist is there.Legal eagles.

Usage guru Bryan A. Garner writes of the word “clearly,”

Exaggerators like this word, along with its cousins (obviously, undeniably, undoubtedly, and the like). Often a statement prefaced with one of these words is exceedingly dubious. (The Oxford Dictionary of American Usage and Style, Oxford University Press, 2000.)

Indeed, take a look at “Anwar al-Awlaki’s Suspected Ties to Terror Plots.” Notice that in only one of the eight plots is there any mention of al-Awlaki’s participation; all the others involve “inspiration” or religious instruction, often of people al-Awlaki never met. But let’s not dwell too much on details. Leon Panetta doesn’t. He follows his “clearly” statement with a tautology (“if you’re a terrorist, you’re a terrorist”). Then comes an equivocation about the administration’s “ability” to do what it did. If Panetta means the physical or mental power to perform the act, then this is self-evidently correct and irrelevant. If he means the legal authority, then he has, in the words of The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, “assum[ed] what is at issue in an argument,” or begged the question (yes, that phrase actually means something). He wraps up with a wordier version of undeniably (“there’s no question”), makes the preceding equivocation plain by distinguishing “authority” from “ability,” and again begs the question.

Panetta was once a practicing lawyer. I see now why he prefers extrajudicial methods.

CIA Assassin in Denver Bagel Store Brawl

Its a pity for Raymond Davis that diplomatic immunity doesn’t extend to suburban Denver.

Davis, the “consulate employee” (read: CIA assassin) who was arrested in January for murdering two people on the streets of Lahore and started a multi-month diplomatic row between the US and Pakistan, underscored what a reasonable man he is today by trouncing another man in front of Einstein Bagels in Highlands Ranch in a dispute over a parking spot.

Davis was arrested on the spot and charged with third degree assault and disorderly conduct. He was later released when he posted $1,750 bond. No word yet on if the Saudi government paid his way out of jail this time.

Join Kelley B. Vlahos for Antiwar Panel at Students for Liberty Philadelphia Regional Conference

Kelley B. Vlahos along with military veterans Daniel Lakemacher and Students for Liberty’s Peter Neiger will be appearing at an Antiwar Break Out Session at the 2011 Students for Liberty Philadelphia Regional Conference. The conference will be held Saturday, October 8th. Register here.

Vlahos is a contributing editor for The American Conservative magazine, a Washington correspondent for the DC-based homeland security magazine, Homeland Security Today, a long-time political writer for FOXNews.com, and weekly columnist for Antiwar.com.